Jeremy Corbyn he's in the SA

Hamas are a great bunch of lads.

Dopey Corbyn does it again :smile:

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/jeremy-corbyn-said-flooding-surrey-17242369

The British electorate have given the two fingers to this IRA apologist. What a personal humiliation for his whacky politics.

Well done Jezza, the 32 county republic in the bag now. A fucking Irish hero, well played Jeremy Corbyn :sparkling_heart:

Corbyn and the Labour left are exonerated, the Blairites are in the dock - they are the ones with questions to answer over the handling of anti-Semitism allegations, and now they’re seething at being exposed and trying to cover it up.

A leaked internal report into Labour’s handling of antisemitism concludes that factional hostility to Jeremy Corbyn hampered the party’s efforts to tackle the problem.

The report does not name an author but was completed in the last months of Corbyn’s leadership. It was intended to be submitted as an annexe to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) inquiry into Labour’s approach to dealing with antisemitism.

However, it is understood it will not be sent, following an intervention by the party’s lawyers. The report’s conclusions clash with complaints of whistleblowers, formerly working for Labour, who told BBC Panorama last year there had been political interference in the process from the top of the party under Corbyn. Their claims were strongly denied by Labour at the time, which accused the BBC of bias and called for the documentary to be pulled.

The new internal report, seen by the Guardian, said it had found no evidence of antisemitism complaints being treated differently to other forms of complaint, or of current or former staff being “motivated by antisemitic intent”.

But the 860-page document said it uncovered many failings in the process for tackling antisemitism complaints before Jennie Formby, the current general secretary, took over in 2018.

The report said there was an “abundant evidence of a hyper-factional atmosphere prevailing in party HQ in this period, which appears to have affected the expeditious and resolute handling of disciplinary complaints”

The report said it might not seem immediately clear why this is relevant but “many staff, including GLU [governance and legal unit] staff and senior staff with responsibility for managing and overseeing GLU, were bitterly opposed to the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, and seem to have been demotivated, or largely interested in work that could advance a factional agenda”.

It said: “At its extreme, some employees seem to have taken a view that the worse things got for Labour the happier they would be, since this might expedite Jeremy Corbyn’s departure from office. Further, there is little evidence of strong management of procedures, workloads and priorities in HQ, which also impacted GLU’s work.”

Ah here Sid.
Starmer did more in five minutes than Corbyn did in his entire tenure ,however long that was.

1 Like

Starmer isn’t half the man Corbyn is.

Have you ever been able to articulate why you hate him?

What mate??

Many good people would still be alive today if only Corbyn had hold of the reins

Unlike the Britain of Boris Johnson, a Britain run by Jeremy Corbyn would not have engaged in a holocaust against its own people, it would have been a kinder, gentler place.

1 Like

Before the far right had gained full control of the UK media journalists would be asking death junkies like Tony Blair questions like ‘Do you have blood on your hands Prime Minister?’
Of course they never answered but the point was questions had to be asked and they were. Alas journalism like this is a but a pipe dream nowadays in the UK

2 Likes

Have you ever been able to rationalise why you despise Corbyn?

I’m no fan of Milne but this makes the Blairite wreckers look like a load of crazy @labane1917s.

https://twitter.com/David__Osland/status/1249423884295774209

I presume the below is Margaret Hodge:

It’s a very good question. A lot of fairly middle of the road even left leaning people hate him and have only vague notions why. The constant smearing the media has to have something to do with it

2 Likes

Regardless of how good, bad or indifferent he was as a leader, he must have known he was unelectable. Why didn’t he step aside for the good of the party and the uk?

1 Like

He isn’t smart enough to know he was unelectable.

4 Likes

Good decent human beings are ‘unelectable’ nowadays I see. Lets all vote for silver spooned misogonystic pigfuckers now instead

3 Likes

He knew rightly. It inflated his ego to think that he was right while the everyone else was wrong. He has a lot to answer for.