Shriek, shriek, shriek!
Interestingly, if you remove one letter form that word, it’s an exact description of what you look like. 
1 Like
Get some help will you, go offline for a few months, the place flourished while you were gone, you were back a week and there was a clamour for the ignore function
Oh dear, all the online Nazis looking for safe spaces, you couldn’t make it up.
1 Like
Sorry sid. I thought you’d be over it by now- but I was careful not to use your name, just in case…
It was the mother and father of all internet beatdowns, mate.
It’s good to know you and the other gormless sheep here are still seething over your fake historical ideas being systematically dismantled by actual, real history, though.
You must be awful dim. Below is an accurate paraphrasing of that piece and any normal persons reaction to it:
“I spoke at Cambridge and loads of people watched the video online therefore loads of cambridge students must want to hear what I have to say.” Hmmm.
“Then I did a podcast on the Bible and loads of people listened to it and loads of people wrote to me and said it was very good so that means it must must have been very important.” Hmmm.
“Next I wanted to do another Bible series on a different bit of the Bible and I wanted Cambridge to offer me a visiting fellowship to study there because I deserve it.” Hmmm.
“To be clear I only heard about any of this on social media.” Hmmm.
“I have more opportunities than I can fulfil anyway so I don’t even give a care about stupid Cambridge.” This is the lad that lectures on emotional maturity.
(He calls some people names). Lol
“Mass attendances are dropping so Cambridge should have made a better decision.” I see.
“Cambridge made a bad decision, they are devious, I’m repeating this for the third time now.” Ok, carry on.
“I believe that the parties in question don’t give a damn about the perilous decline of Christianity, and I presume in any case that they regard that faith, in their propaganda-addled souls, as the ultimate manifestation of the oppressive Western patriarchy, despite their hypothetical allegiance to their own discipline.” This is probably the kind of meaningless sentence that stupid people think sounds smart.
“Some angry ranting at the end, it’s clear that my feelings are really hurt and I’m lashing out.” Ah godhelpus.
The PS bit at the end: “It’s a conspiracy against me”. Of course it is pet.
1 Like
Paraphrasing does not mean what you think it means.
Normal person does not mean a person with the same view as you.
Why are people who espouse diversity afraid of anybody with a different opinion to them.
2 Likes
They are not afraid, they hate them
1 Like
It’s quite fascist.
Did you read the tripe? I shortened it
Let me ladybird it even further for you.
He makes a number of false assumptions. They’re glaring. That’s funny. He says Cambridge’s decision is wrong. He can’t say why. It is apparent his feelings are hurt and he’s very angry. It’s a bit sad.
You’ve put in a lot of time and effort here glas. I just wanted to acknowledge that.
3 Likes
Peterson is seething, he hates free speech.
You don’t see the glaring insanity of a Faculty of Divinity banning someone for expressing Christian views?
1 Like
Consumed with hatred. They would round up everyone who voted for Trump or Brexit and throw them in a gulag if they could.
That never happened 
But that’s exactly what happened. He applied for a visiting fellowship to the Faculty of Divinity as an academic and was turned down after the faculty came under pressure from the student union. If you don’t believe that’s censorship then obviously you are a fascist.
You just said they banned him for expressing Christian views. You made that up. It never happened. You lunatic.
In a statement, Cambridge University students’ union said: “We are relieved to hear that Jordan Peterson’s request for a visiting fellowship to Cambridge’s faculty of divinity has been rescinded following further review. It is a political act to associate the University with an academic’s work through offers which legitimise figures such as Peterson.
“His work and views are not representative of the student body and as such we do not see his visit as a valuable contribution to the University, but one that works in opposition to the principles of the University.”
——/———
Many student fraternities and other student groups already banned Jews and regularly protested against professors they believed did not support supposed traditional German values.
What do you think gets talked about at “public lectures on the bible”?