Jordan Peterson šŸ vs CH4

ā€¦and you are a defender of child rapists.

So called libertarianism is a fraud. It does not exist. It cannot exist. It is a logical contradiction.

It is divided into two categories. One, the true believers, the harmless faux profound simpletons, of which in my day at least youā€™d generally find one in the corner of a room at college parties smoking a joint on the couch at 3am, and whose batshit beliefs would quietly slip out.

The other category are the rapacious monsters, the neo-fascists, like the Republican party and its associated bullshit industrial complex.

In the case of pronouns, heā€™s far from the bully. Coercing people to speak and think a certain way is authoritarian. Language is very simple, itā€™s a gameā€¦ And we use an agreed set of rules to communicate wants and needs. Iā€™m not against new words or terms being introduced but they have to have a practicality that enhances a society, to meet its needs and wants. Thereā€™s over 50 different pronouns that trans groups want to introduce into society and at the will of the individual. They wanted to make the individuals wish law in Canada and coerce other members of society to meander to it otherwise it was a hate crime? Thatā€™s an authoritarian state.

?

I did not bring up Harvard.

OK Gemma.

Typical lash out response of the far left when their radical leanings are not agreed with.

Excerpt from ā€˜The life of Don Juan Malarkeyā€™

Your whole opinion of this topic is rooted in being triggered by the enhancing of personal freedom for trans people and the curbing of the ā€œrightā€ of bullies to bully.

Thatā€™s snowflakism.

@Malarkey has a sister in Canada?

Brian Gleeson

Sheā€™s a cracker

Brian Gleeson

How does it feel to be really stupid? What is the sensation actually like? Could you compare it to anything?

An oul flu, perpetually?

Personal freedom, by coercing others all after you admitted thereā€™s no absolute freedomsā€¦ Youā€™re all over the place.

1 Like

How so? There are no absolute freedoms, itā€™s the simple reality of the world because our world depends on people co-existing. You try to draw the lines at the place which will bring the most just freedoms to as many as possible. But we must also acknowledge that the rights of a minority to enjoy freedom should not be determined by a majority.

Mr. Peterson and you are just triggered because the right to bully and vilify based on gender orientation is quite correctly considered by Canada to not be one of those just freedoms.

The freedom of pathetic manbabyism to oppress gender minorities is not a just freedom.

So if we donā€™t meander to trans individualsā€™ wishes to be called by one of the nearly 70 different gender neutral pronouns they have made up in recent times, and at the whim of the mood theyā€™re in, then we are oppressing them? :grinning: Next youā€™ll be telling me pre op trans women should be allowed share toilets and changing rooms with women and little girls or thatā€™s oppressing themā€¦

The problem with radical leftists is that you really donā€™t care about the cause at hand, itā€™s just something to hide behind as you tear away at society for the sake of your own desires and wants.

18 Likes

Itā€™s hard to believe somebody would go to the bother of writing this shit. :grin:

No Gemma?

Peterson actually said he had no problem using a pronoun somebody asked him to use but it was a step too far for government to legislate for it to be a criminal offence not to use the requested pronoun

3 Likes

We can all get down with that to a degree. But hate speech because today someone wants to be called ze and tomorrow hirā€¦ The standard male white privilege thrown at you then if you disagree with any radical left ideology.