What is patently evident is that I made the comparison, you defended the fact that 16 years olds should play senior football against fully developed adults - now that I have show some serious double standards you donât want to compare and contrast both instances.
A 13 year old playing u20 is no worse than a 15 or 16 year playing against fully developed male adults. That is my point and itâs something you are doing a very bad job trying to argue.
Because he had the speed and skill to compete with adults you dummy.
Karamoko has the skill and speed to compete with males in their late adolescence.
so its ok if they are good enough?
Incorrect. I implied nembo and celtic are happy to turn a blind eye to child abuse
No
The point that youâre missing is key.
The physical and mental development at 13 in comparison to 16 are worlds apart.
And the point youâre missing is the physical and mental development between 15/16 and 28/29 are worlds apart.
Is he not under 13?
no, he is playing u20 mate
Youâre tying yourself up in knots here.
How old is he?
nearly 14
Old enough not to have one of the players he is playing against to also be his father.
Seriously, bro. Would you be happy to let your 13 year old son play against adults?
Just to get it out of the way, I disagree with this kid being played in this instance. But thatâs unrelated to the point Iâm making.
It doesnât matter if @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy could âidentify itâ. In the same way it doesnât matter if you identify it or even think you can, its meaningless because youâre not able to do it accurately, lacking the clinical and professional ability and knowledge to do so.
i dont believe in competitive sports mate so no point asking me
Is he? He was born in 03?
Iâm out now but suffice to say thereâs a huge difference between 13 and 16, nobody is sufficiently developed at 13 to play elite adult sport, that tiny boy is certainly not.
Is there not a huge difference mentally and phsyically between 18 year olds and 28/29 year olds?
How does that compare?
yes