Proof Kev, proof.
You are not getting any, itâs too much hassle.
If you donât believe it you donât believe it, I really couldnât give a fuck.
These are tips for people to take a look at, take them as they see them. Itâs not a competition.
too much hassle to post a pic kev caught out yet again
Too much hassle collecting an imaginary bet more like.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1071730, member: 273â]Call away, it was predictive text. I didnât notice it till today, Iâm not going editing predictions as it will look like I edited the bets.
Can I get a ruling from @fenwaypark[/USER] , [USER=1]@Rocko[/USER] , [USER=464]@ciarancareyshurlingarmy
If 2 vote for it being ok, then grand. If not the bet is void. I lose 3.5 according to this thread.[/QUOTE]
I think you made it more complicated by correcting it to Nalanga. The ladâs name is Nalaga, is it not? Clearly a typo as you were betting on that Clermont game. Iâm going to allow it.
I havenât bet on every tip. Sometimes I have not had access, but got the tip out as I thought it was value. I canât access betting sites on my phone for instance.
Did you knock the winnings off your balance without punting it? If so, change the title to Kevâs sporting bets/imaginary bets.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1071730, member: 273â]Call away, it was predictive text. I didnât notice it till today, Iâm not going editing predictions as it will look like I edited the bets.
Can I get a ruling from @fenwaypark[/USER] , [USER=1]@Rocko[/USER] , [USER=464]@ciarancareyshurlingarmy
If 2 vote for it being ok, then grand. If not the bet is void. I lose 3.5 according to this thread.[/QUOTE]
Ok with me, pretty obvious it was Malaga.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1071730, member: 273â]Call away, it was predictive text. I didnât notice it till today, Iâm not going editing predictions as it will look like I edited the bets.
Can I get a ruling from @fenwaypark[/USER] , [USER=1]@Rocko[/USER] , [USER=464]@ciarancareyshurlingarmy
If 2 vote for it being ok, then grand. If not the bet is void. I lose 3.5 according to this thread.[/QUOTE]
I dont know how I got called into this one! Not going to disagree with Fenners & Rocko. 3-0
Nalaga i mean
Nah. People see what it is.
Balance Ciaran. You seem like a man who likes his bets. Same with fenners and Rocko, despite being a capitalist pig, has form of being fair and straight on such issues.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1071558, member: 273â]-6.65 before last night. 15 put on, - 21.65
Clermont - loss
Nalanga - win 4.5
UUJ - win 10.0 (retarded odds by the way)
- 7.15[/QUOTE]
Finished like this.
-7.15
Toulouse 21-30 @ 4.33, 3 points (PP)
Quins1-12 @ 2.29 , 3 points (PP)
Exeter 1-10 @ 2.3, 3 points (PP)
Meath to win @ 2.29, 3 points (PP)
West Ham/Man C Double @ 3.2, 5 points (PP)
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1075428, member: 273â]Toulouse 21-30 @ 4.33, 3 points (PP)
Quins1-12 @ 2.29 , 3 points (PP)[/QUOTE]
-13.15, dreadful tipping on the Quins one
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1075493, member: 273â]Meath to win @ 2.29, 3 points (PP)
[/QUOTE]
Such a shame to see all those hours spent watching underage Meath football online while in Australia wasted
:D:clap: