Wahey.
If only Larry Duff was still alive to answer this.
i’m not a fan of his either but he did come 3rd in 2009
BREAKING: LONDON (AP) _ AP sources: IOC strips Lance Armstrong of 2000 Olympic bronze medal.
He finished less than 1 minute behind Armstrong. Who was most likely completely doped as before.
Even to argue or contemplate the idea that Wiggins rides completely cleanly is just madness.
true but he was 4th in 2009.
4th on the road. Promoted to 3rd when the Cancer Jesus had his results taken away.
I am not sure about Wiggins. The course was made for him last year. He was Olympic champion so he has an engine. There is a levelling off in average speeds etc in recent years so the doping may be less rampant. Weight loss is a big factor in improvement, and he lost a lot since 2009. No doubt you can do stuff with sports science and bikes etc, microseconds count but it is mainly on the track. But then you see Froome in the same team and he came from no where to be a major Tour contender. And Brad is less vocal about doping than he used to be. So I reckon a healthy dose of scepticism is needed.
[quote=“Fagan ODowd, post: 152355”]
Just to put some perspective on it. A 30 year old guy finishes 39 minutes off the pace in 2010 in the Tour and improves so much through the correct use of skin suits and bikes that two years later at the age of 32 he wins the Tour with 3 minutes to spare. Hello?
[/quote]The counter to this is that the peloton is now relatively clean due to the bio passport, and wiggins is naturally a top rider and has without doubt the best backup. I’m not saying this is true but it is an argument. The use of the altitude tent is another possible factor. He also lost a lot of weight, and Tyler Hamilton said in his book that if given the option he would rather lose 3kg than boost his hit by 3 points. My suspicion is most provoked by a small bump in haemoglobin in the middle of the tour, when science and logic suggest it should be dropping, but he may well have been dehydrated or the sample may have been differently handled as could easily happen. I just don’t know on this one, and I am the ultimate cynic when it comes to doping.
Fucker just admitted to taking every drug under the sun.
Oprah butted in a lot at the start, improving a bit now as it’s going on.
No doping since 2005 me hole
Says he was clean in 2009 and 2010.
USADA says otherwise. Says he was "really upset" that they claimed he was jacked up in '09 and '10… :lol:
He’s as snakey the hoor
Tearing the hole out of it with the ads
“I see Ferrari is a good man, a smart man/”
Fuck me.
Was that interview on Ferari part of the federal case? If so is he not fucked now?
Getting boring at this point. Could have stopped after the first ten minutes seeing as he refuses to give anyone up or any details.
Part of the SCA deposition.
SCA are the crowd that paid out the $10-15m, or what ever it was, bonus to him for winning multiple tours. The had refused to pay because of doping allegations, so he took them to court.
[quote=“His Holiness Da Dalai Lama, post: 152373”]
Part of the SCA deposition.
SCA are the crowd that paid out the $10-15m, or what ever it was, bonus to him for winning multiple tours. The had refused to pay because of doping allegations, so he took them to court.[/quote]
I assume they’ll sue the balls or ball off him again now. The cunt is admitting fuck all bar he took drugs himself.
Apologising to Emma O’Reilly right now… fair fucks to Oprah for bringing her into the discussion.