VVD is a very questionable pro, has shown no loyalty to Southampton.
Loyalty is an overrated concept in the modern game. No player owes any loyalty to an entity who would sell them in the morning if it suited them. Loyalty is for mugs.
If youâre under contract, you should play and not down tools.
This lad is a perfect player for Liverpool, a top top player, heâll be a legend at Anfield
You cannot make someone play for you if they do not wish to do so. They could fine him all they wished, but the right course of action would have been to sell him and buy a fucking striker, something they sorely need. Theyâve wasted half a season and are now in a relegation battle. Mugs.
Klopp on Pogba fee:
"The day that this is football, Iâm not in a job anymore. The game is about playing together. I want to do it differently. Iâd even do it differently if I could spend that money.â
He was part of the sieve
Agreed you canât make a player play for you, but its bad form from the player to down tools sulk and not play until he moves on, he was always going once Liverpool met Southamptons valuation in January.
Letâs see if that valuation play works out come the end of the season.
I canât wait til Jose comments on Liverpool spending striker money on defenders.
The pretend IRA and the United Shills are seething.
Loyalty is for cups.
Lots of lads clearly rattled by this statement of intent from Liverpool.
Great to see VVD picking the big club.
A keeper wouldnât go astray either
Great stuff. Thank you Liverpool.
Just saw that the club who spunked 50m on stones, 42m on mangala and 52m on Mendy baulked at paying 75 for VVD
Poetry in motion
Tra la la la
VVD good as he is canât prevent type of errors that gave away first 2 goals against Arsenal
Welcome Virgil
How much do Celtic pocket out of this potential deal?