He is a good player though. Heās more of a wing-forward than striker and, to be fair, missed the entire end of last season through injury. His goal rate wasnāt too bad before that.
It is an awful lot of money when you do see other, more proven, players going for a lot cheaper. However, his wages coming from Ajax are probably a lot lower than some. He is young aswell with potential to improve.
Fergie left multi millionaires footballers in tears during his teamtalks? What utter nonsense.
Jesus to Arsenal was a steal in relation to other transfers being mentioned
ā¬80m for a player that hasnāt proven himself outside of the Erdevise is an awful lot of money
Players such as guilit van basten suarez rikard van nistelroy
Whatās the point of playing to the strengths of these feckers when they have a ceiling anyway. Kinnerk and Kiely didnāt come in and play to the strengths of Jimbob Ryan
Youāre talking out of your hole now.
Rashford is nowhere near good enough to play at the top level. No more than McTominay or almost anyone who has come through the United system in decades.
Suarez was a force of nature, Van Nistelroy picked up some handy tap ins in a great United team. The rest of them chose an easy life in the pedestrian Serie A
Ruud van Nistelrooy was a goal machine. One of the best players United had in my lifetime. Offloaded because he wasnāt getting on with CR7.
In fairness to Rashford, he is a great fella to go on about social injustices with Barack Obama over an aul Webex call.
Van Nistelrooy was magnificent.
True. But heād do nothing in this utd team
Casemiro deal being finalised tomorrow.
Very unlikely heād play on Monday. Needs to be registered by noon.
And have his visa sorted. No chance Iād say.
Fine player. Ā£60m for a 30 year old seems spicy, but thatās the way itās gone now
Ā£70m for a 30 year old, eek
ā¬80M, serious investment
And the protests about the most generous owners in the league will continue