More attacking the messenger from FF. This is from the Irish Times letters from Tuesday - written by John Cregan (FF TD) and ridiculously relying on his crap role as Chairman of the Oireachtas Committee on Communications - as though this conveyed some sort of authority or expertise.
The more damning the Mahon Tribunal evidence, the more they turn against the Tribunal itself and its importance.
RT’S COVERAGE OF TRIBUNAL
Madam, - RT’s continued obsession with the Mahon tribunal is an issue of extreme concern to me and many of my fellow members in the Oireachtas.
On Thursday (February 21st) the coverage of the evidence of An Taoiseach Bertie Ahern at Dublin Castle was, by any analysis, excessive in the extreme.
On a day when our national airport faced crisis and many people faced potential job losses, RT chose to dedicate their lead story to the events at Dublin Castle on virtually every single news bulletin, and even transmitted live from the courtyard on the Six O’clock news.
Was this really the biggest news story of the day to the citizens of Ireland?
I fully accept and respect the tribunal’s mandate to investigate issues of corruption, equally I recognise RT’s responsibility to the public to inform them of the serious issues which are being investigated by the tribunal of inquiry.
However, as chairman of the Oireachtas Committee on Communications, I feel duty bound to ask questions on behalf of the Irish taxpayer and licence-paying public.
The treatment of this story in the news sections was further sensationalised all day long by a series of journalists discussing and analysing the exchanges during the course of the day.
In one single day no fewer that 18 journalists (11 RT journalists and broadcasters, seven additional journalists from other publications), a public relations expert, a barrister and two actors were used to reflect and parse and analyse this issue for the entire day.
Throughout the day we were treated to a constant series of journalists interviewing each other and expected to accept that this in some way represented a fair and balanced assessment of what transpired on the day and what has happened historically in relation to this matter over a number of years.
Having attempted to follow this story for a number of years I am weary, as I am sure are the public, of the constant attempts to have this issue exalted to the status of public execution by the media.Many people depend on RT for their news to keep themselves informed about national and international developments. I sincerely believe that the news coverage, coupled with the over-analysis by a number of like-minded individuals on the airwaves is contributing to a disillusionment with the body politic and I suggest that RT looks at their coverage with a view to re-establishing some sense of proportion and balance.
We should allow the tribunal to conduct its work and come to its conclusions. Equally, journalists should report the facts and allow people to make up their own minds on these issues. We should not be subjected to day-long opinions and conclusions as is the case at present.
The national broadcaster RT in their mission statement state that they will “inform the Irish public by delivering the best comprehensive independent news service possible” and “operate in the public interest, providing News and Current Affairs that is fair and impartial, accurate and challenging” and “connect with our audiences by understanding and satisfying their needs”. Failing to address this issue could very well leave the national broadcaster open to claims of agenda-setting and bias.
For a broadcaster with such a strong and well deserved reputation for balance and political impartiality, I believe this is not simply a matter of choice but a matter of necessity. - Yours, etc,
JOHN CREGAN, TD,
Dil ireann,
Dublin 2.