People with a great future behind them

[The_Most_Infamous]

I don’t think they conciously put out disinformation either but their approach of vaccinating kids to protect the vulnerable without realising the medicine - thats what I’d call it rather than a vaccine which had no effect on transmission is outrageous.

They also sacked a large number of their own staff who worked fearlessly through the initial phase of the pandemic when no one knew how dangerous the virus was. They had the British public out dancing and clapping their hands for them in 2020. Great stuff.

Then, when a few of those same workers who risked their lives were hesitant to take the jabs, they were sacked and labled as far right conspiracy nutjobs.

The above would be a slight concern for me anyway.

[Cheasty]

I see you edited your last post so

@The_Most_Infamous

They have been shown up to be badly wrong to fire health workers who didnt take the covid jabs and they were also very wrong pushing those jabs down to kids to protect their grannies when the vaccine didnt stop transmission.

How were they wrong? Individuals prepared to increase risk to patients were breaking the Hippocratic Oath of “First, do no harm” - they were prepared to put patients at risk through their own selfish choices - seems like prima facie misconduct and grounds for sacking to me

Did the Covid vaccines reduce transmission?

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

The COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated efficacy in reducing transmission of the virus, although the extent of this reduction can vary depending on factors such as vaccine type, population characteristics, and the emergence of new variants.

Clinical trials initially focused primarily on assessing the vaccines’ ability to prevent symptomatic illness and severe disease. However, as vaccination campaigns progressed and real-world data became available, studies began to examine the vaccines’ impact on transmission.

Overall, numerous studies have shown that COVID-19 vaccines can significantly reduce transmission by lowering viral loads in vaccinated individuals who become infected. This means that vaccinated individuals are less likely to spread the virus to others compared to unvaccinated individuals. However, breakthrough infections can still occur, especially with the emergence of new variants of the virus, which may affect the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing transmission.

Vaccination campaigns, alongside other public health measures such as masking and social distancing, remain crucial in controlling the spread of COVID-19 and reducing transmission rates. Additionally, ongoing research and surveillance efforts continue to assess the vaccines’ effectiveness in different populations and against emerging variants of the virus.

Did the Covid vaccines reduce viral load?

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Yes, COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to reduce viral load in vaccinated individuals who become infected with the virus. This reduction in viral load is an important factor in reducing transmission rates, as individuals with lower viral loads are less likely to spread the virus to others.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that vaccinated individuals who experience breakthrough infections tend to have lower viral loads and are less likely to develop severe illness compared to unvaccinated individuals. Lower viral loads not only decrease the likelihood of transmission but also reduce the severity of disease and the risk of complications.

However, it’s important to note that breakthrough infections can still occur, especially with the emergence of new variants of the virus. Additionally, the level of reduction in viral load may vary depending on factors such as vaccine type, timing of vaccination, and individual immune responses.

Overall, while COVID-19 vaccines have been effective in reducing viral load and transmission, continued monitoring and research are necessary to understand their long-term effectiveness and their ability to provide protection against emerging variants of the virus.

Thank you Roy

[Cheasty]

@The_Most_Infamous

I don’t think they conciously put out disinformation

OK so you withdraw your claim

I’ve already addressed the other concerns in your post in my previous post above

[The_Most_Infamous]

I’m not withdrawing anything mate. I don’t think they ever conciously went out to spread disinformation. The key is that they did on that occassion.

Which if we go back to what we were initially discussing this evening, they can’t just be believed without any question.

[TreatyStones]

He’ll probably get an MBA or something while he’s in there

[Cheasty]

@The_Most_Infamous

I’m not withdrawing anything mate.

You literally did withdraw it

@The_Most_Infamous

It wouldnt be the first time that the NHS put out disinformation, mate.

@The_Most_Infamous

I don’t think they conciously put out disinformation either

Disinformation is consciously putting out wrong information

@The_Most_Infamous

I don’t think they ever conciously went out to spread disinformation. The key is that they did on that occassion.

You’ve contradicted yourself within two sentences here

@The_Most_Infamous

Which if we go back to what we were initially discussing this evening, they can’t just be believed without any question.

By your logic anything the NHS says now is a lie - unless you want to pick and choose what to believe based on your personal biases, which is obviously the case - and that’s not critical thinking, it’s believing only what you want to believe, a phenomenon which has this world in the very bad state it’s currently in

May I also remind you that you are in favour of legalising all drugs

Weird position to take for somebody who is anti-vaccine and anti-trans breastfeeding

@The_Most_Infamous

Legalise and tax all drugs would be my opinion, mate.

[The_Most_Infamous]

Look mate, my question earlier was in relation to a piece in the Times which you posted earlier. The headline was probably clickbait and alluded to transgender people having similar breast milk to naturally born women.

I thought that was an outrageous statement and an attack on women. I stand by that totally.

I think you asked me for my scientific take on that. Post up the link and I’ll do my best.

[Cheasty]

@The_Most_Infamous

Look mate, my question earlier was in relation to a piece in the Times which you posted earlier. The headline was probably clickbait and alluded to transgender people having similar breast milk to naturally born women.

I thought that was an outrageous statement and an attack on women. I stand by that totally.

We have a medical expert here

[The_Most_Infamous]

Appreciate the compliment mate. Have you the link though re the NHS’ statement?

It needs more context than a one liner if its to be taken anyway bit seriously.

[Cheasty]

Roberto De Zerbi

[BruidheanChaorthainn]

@Cheasty

Roberto De Zerbi

This spoofer apparently called out Tony bloom.

I’d say he’ll be out of a job soon enough.

[myboyblue]

Naby lad

'He let his team down' - Keita suspended by Werder

Former Liverpool midfielder Naby Keita has been suspended by Werder Bremen until the end of the season and given a “substantial fine” after refusing to travel with the team for Sunday’s Bundesliga game at Bayer Leverkusen.

The club said after Keita, 29, found out he would not start the match he “decided to go home instead”.

[caulifloweredneanderthal]

Boxty had a fierce soft spot for Naby lad.

[myboyblue]

Another man ruined by Liverpool

[LionelRitchie]

Not quite a person but google as a search engine- its days are numbered.

Been using a paid for version of Chaptgpt and holy fuck, its like having access to the controls to Starship Enterprise.

[balbec]

Emma Raducanu

[backinatracksuit]

The Sporting Lisbon manager

[BruidheanChaorthainn]

Donnie cnn

[Bandage]

I’d forgotten this chap existed until he was just mentioned on the main US election thread.

Somebody bump the people you forgot existed thread too.

[BruidheanChaorthainn]

The success got to his head.