You’re rattled?
1 Like
There’s an embarrassing amount of whataboutery on this topic and it’s preventing any constructive debate unfortunately and makes the topic impossible to read for anyone.
Trying to find offence in posts from years ago is the exact behaviour that a certain crank is resorting to on Twitter.
If you want to quote a recent post as part of a debate, go ahead. If you are quoting the same old post multiple times out of context on separate topics then that’s just spamming the board and prevents anyone else from debating.
Free speech rant incoming… 3.2.1
3 Likes
I can answer this question. His agenda is fighting racism.
You don’t need to go diving in to protect him,he should have to stand over his own statements especially when he calls others out for not doing so.
Anyway you are looking for posts from today care to show some evidence behind this statement?
Do you care to explain the Karen comments?
So, can we agree that the purpose of the thread and the site, in general, is to “uphold the value of robust and even caustic counter-speech from all quarters”, without the need to label someone with a conflicting view as “racist”?
Only a simpleton would think you fight racism by calling posters on an online forum “racist pieces of shit”. Are you a simpleton?
Is that one of those rhetorical questions?
Have you ever slept with a black woman? Do you like Tupac?
No mate. I’m asking him if he is a simpleton.
You were wondering was he a simpleton ironmoth
Care to explain why glas is called Karen by a certain cohort everytime he posts an opinion. Usually followed up with fanny and hysterical type slurs? You’re one of them
Glas is king of his world.
Firstly, it’s telling that you’re not debating the stupid part.
Secondly, your racism seeps from many of your posts. It’s an obvious pattern of criticising people and anti racism movements you don’t agree with while maintaining silence on other issues.
It’s abundantly clear that your devotion to attacking those campaigning against racial injustice is motivated by your own biases.
Your inevitable protest will fall on deaf ears so save yourself the bother.
Sure. But just to clarify, he’s not called that every time he posts an opinion. I believe the first instance of the term being used was in response to @glasagusban calling @maroonandwhite “fanny”. It was used for a few days in an effort to maybe get him to tone down his shrieking, but it didn’t work and it seems to have been parked. Unfortunately, the name-calling and labelling from Glas has escalated.
what a fearless debater!!
All criticism and comment welcome,as long as it lines up exactly with your own thinking.
But you can’t quote one. Ohhhh kay
Shur Labane was a pains to mention numerous times yesterday that someone posted a link to a moderators Linkedln Account yesterday.
A normal person wouldn’t be highlighting it.
Was a great aul Ballhop all the same
You don’t get to decide on the purpose of TFK unfortunately.
I don’t see how IRA apologists can preach morality. I am genuinely at a loss here.
2 Likes