Frank is a special case though
TH backed Donal Og all the way in the strikes. The favor was called in, and Ogie toed the line.
I can see the similarities to be fair
Ah yeah wouldnt doubt that for a second. I was talking about financially and what he would do for work
Id be surprised if HR dept in his job didnt have a discussion about this with him too
You don’t see a problem with this?
Correct me if I’m wrong but I seem to recall that the journo from The Examiner, Michael Moynihan, handled the press stuff for the players during the strike. I could be wrong but I think I remember it being a surprise that DOgC gave the biography gig to TH.
No idea pal. Am sure a google would answer your question.
So if i write a column for you i’m allowed abuse kids?
Is this the Press logic?
Toes the line? Thats a very sinister way of putting it. Is someone in charge here of something?
Nah I don’t think it is. I only heard it cos I was working in Cork at the time. They closed ranks fairly well but word got around all the same.
Thats what you took from that?! Thats a fucked up world view.
No.
He fucked up.
Actually no. Thats too kind.
He supported a paedo. Its nearly as bad in ways. Its similar to tuening a blind eye. The damage done by the verdict is huge. The impact on so many people is immeasurable. Donal Og help facilitate that.
I wouldn’t worry a dot if he lost the job as well.
Thats what you wrote as Donals Ogs thought process
Now, not to support Donal Óg here, but has he said that in his character reference?
You made it look like the favour was called so he had to do it.
Thats a value system i would question.
I couldn’t give a fuck what agreement or favour i owed. You go do shit like that then you are off the list.
Humphries is not a paedophile. He’s a child sex abuser. Subtle difference between the two but not surprising you don’t get it.
Cusack didn’t “support” him. He gave a character reference, which is not the same thing.
Cusack made a mistake and you appear to be imploring that his life should be ruined as a result, that he should lose his job as a result and not get employment in future as a result of this.
That is an actual witch hunt, as opposed to the fake witch hunts that people have been imagining in recent weeks.
A witch hunt wpuld be if i contacted the radio or media or his employers.
I think its you who do not understand terms.
Child sex abuser. Whatever, tomato-tomato.
He supported a scumbag. He helped get a reduced sentence. End of story.
I am quite entitiled to express my disgust.
I do not have the time to witch hunt anyone.
No, I do understand them, which is why I had to correct you, who does not understand them.
You do not understand witch hunt
Writing about somebody’s “life being ruined” and seeing no problem with it does smack me as very reminiscent of a “witch hunt”.
You are somewhere between disturb and dumb.
You need psychological assessment Sid.
Honestly, go see someone. You are a danger to someone, maybe just yourself