It’s Pammy.
Jaysus Kev you should be able to tell Pammy from any angle! And she’s well rough at this stage, but the beauty of Anderson was, it was never the face you were looking at. 
The tattoo was the give away, she’s in the right thread alright.
She’ll always hold a special place in the heart of folk of my generation 
Is she not an auld wan?
42 so yea, but still roughish, she falls between both stools
http://cdn.wwtdd.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/pame3.jpg
Mira Sorvino is edging dangerously close to roughish territory
http://cdn.wwtdd.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/fp_3568125_ang_likedandeliondust_film_090709.jpg
I may be risking a lot here, but fuck it, I would, and if you were honest, so would you.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-0660860F000005DC-856_306x695.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06609861000005DC-56_306x761.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D8D000005DC-315_306x584.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D99000005DC-292_306x584.jpg
[quote=“myboyblue”]I may be risking a lot here, but fuck it, I would, and if you were honest, so would you.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-0660860F000005DC-856_306x695.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06609861000005DC-56_306x761.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D8D000005DC-315_306x584.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D99000005DC-292_306x584.jpg[/quote]
![http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D99000005DC-292_306x584.jpg[/quote]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/11/article-0-06606D99000005DC-292_306x584.jpg%5B/quote%5D){kind=link}
[[/I]
You wouldn’t MBB… would you??
Yep. I make no bones about it either.
Tight body? Check.
Decent face (well good enough for thet roughish thread)? Check.
Decent tits (albeit fake)? Check.
Tight ass? Check.
Dirty look to her? Check.
Worth a twist imo.
Clijsters
http://www.tennisw.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=2&pictureid=89
http://blog.taragana.com/sports/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/clijsters.jpg
Ah for fuck sake. Rough doesn’t mean dog ugly fat birds. Saw a doc on her the other night, she is a big bitch, massive masive arse on her in regular clothers.
No way.
Nah. She epitomises this thread IMO.
I’d like to see her out of uniform to be honest. Was thinking this to myself the other night as I watched her match with the rap community person, and as the game went on she began to improve. I wonder with the hair down and in normal clothes, would be alright. Its an interesting one gaillimh.
Great stuff.
Here she is with a bit of slap on.
http://www.insidesocal.com/tomhoffarth/archives/clijsters.jpg
Unable to view that in here, will check in later on.
On the left here.
Anyways, she deserves a place here.
Thats exactly what i’m basing this on. I’ve seen her at an awards thing as well, done up to the nines. She looks like a traveller going to a debs.
Just compare her to Pam and Victoria, they are proper rough. They were reasonably hot at some stage or in some way throughout their lives, not this Belgian lump…Nice girl and all that she may be.
[quote=“caoimhaoin”]ing to a debs.
Just compare her to Pam and Victoria, they are proper rough. They were reasonably hot at some stage or in some way throughout their lives, not this Belgian lump…Nice girl and all that she may be.[/quote]
Nah, who said they had to be nice at some stage? What about the birds that are always a bit rough?
Nah, who said they had to be nice at some stage? What about the birds that are always a bit rough?[/quote]
They are generally reasonable good looking, pretty or whatever, but carry a bit of poundage, or are in Victorias case too little weight. The other way they can get in is if they are not great looking, but have a smoking body.
Kim has none of this.