Rugby Players Rape Trial

Do you think rape is not a traumatic experience?

How many times is the girl claiming she said no?

I would say it is yes. Very traumatic

And that’s why I do not believe this girl was raped.

In no way from the transcripts I have read was this girl traumatised. At any point.

So your theory does not hold up at all

Poor use of language. “I did not hear” could be taken as “I was not listening”.
He should just have said “that did not happen”

3 Likes

Not sure she said she said no once it started. She was “frozen in fear”.

Prosecution have not gotten over the Gain line today.

She wasn’t traumatised when the taxi driver brought her home, an independent witness? You don’t think Harrison’s text that the girl was hysterical and it wasn’t going to end well was a sign she was traumatised?

Have you ever seen a woman after a few drinks

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wDIiPIJmXcE

No.

Hysterical does not equal traumatised.

Your lack of knowledge on women is quite funny.

They can go from zero to hysterical faster than you can put your money down at a Tyrone dog fight

10 Likes

Women get extremely emotional after consuming alcohol.
They can cry at the drop of a hat.

7 Likes

thats a great line

1 Like

Strange you edited your post.

I think this is the crux of it with nembo.

He has his prejudice but he is largely just unaware of the manipulative nature of some females.

Sid is just mentally ill and loves talking rubbish

3 Likes

It’s nice to see you taking liberties on a woman’s emotional state.

He destroyed him there.

Nice?

That’s a weird thing to say.

Firstly I never have and never would and did not indicate that.

But secondly you seem to think it’s a good thing to do that. Touch fucked if you ask me.

It was a glib comment on your disregard for a woman’s emotional state.

Mea culpa - I added video and deleted Text. Now back in.

Women are emotional after a few drinks. Men too.

Was Paddy Jackson emotional after what he did? A lot of physical damage was inflicted on the victim’s private parts.

Why are you fabricating evidence?

Medical evidence was of an internal cut and No damage to external vagina. Non conclusive of consensual or non consensual sex.

The cut is consistent with Jackson digitally penetrating the complainant as the medical evidence states the penis is designed not to injure the vagina.

You are grasping now. Like prosecution who suggested women don’t enjoy giving blow jobs.

The reason you don’t believe she was raped is because that’s the position you took based on absolutely nothing, before any evidence had even been given, and it’s the position you’ve decided to stick to come hell or high water.

That’s a fact.

It’s become very clear as the trial has developed that you have a deep seated anger towards women.

2 Likes