Case closed.
Most rape victims are passive, something the defence team confirmed. The witness confirmed their were no signs of positive consent.
Jaysus…
Asked by Toby Hedworth QC for the complainant: “Do most victims of victims of sexual assault resist it or allow it to happen?”
Dr Hall told Belfast Crown Court: “No, I think the evidence is overwhelming that it is allowed to happen.”
She saw a threesome. That was her evidence.
Allowing to happen is not the discussion here
She saw no sign of positive consent. That was her evidence too. Odd how you seem so intent of selectively choosing parts of testimony.
For a fairly level headed poster normally you keep repeating this despite her not saying it. She said she 100% saw sex, she said there didn’t appear to be any sign of distress. The same certainty isn’t in both of those statements
4 Likes
The court heard that she did not have any concerns about what she saw in the bedroom.
It explicitly is. The girl said she froze when it happened. Your stupidity is off the charts.
Yes, they also heard she saw nothing to suggest the women was definitely consenting. They also heard her categorically rule out Jackson’s account of events.
1 Like
After opening the door to the upstairs bedroom, prosecution barrister Toby Hedworth asked: “You opened the door? What was the result?”
“Seeing a threesome,” she told the court. She said that she had opened the door for “less than a minute”.
It’s actually not.
But carry on making a clown of yourself
1 Like
Are you saying that a threesome can’t be rape?
1 Like
It was Ms Florence’s account that proved most pertinent, with her comment that she did not believe that she had witnessed a rape.
Mr Kelly asked her whether she knew what the term “frozen in fear” meant, asking whether she thought the alleged victim had appeared this way as she watched her on the bed.
“No,” she replied.
Ffs you are pig stupid
Explain what’s stupid about my post. I expect you won’t and will try to deflect as usual
1 Like
From the movement.
She also saw only one of Jackson’s arms.
She also saw Olding’s hands on this thighs, not on this woman’s head.
For kids who were deprecate for the ridiculous detail of ongoing positive verbal consent to be given, you’re strangely ignoring details.
Yet her story completely blows Jackson claims out of the water but tally in with what the victim alleged happen.
1 Like
can we draw a line here and call this woman a tramp?
You really need to move on from this.
“Not rolling away” “off the ball tackle”
