Ken early done it too on the Irish times. Said pep knew heâd lost Messi it was time to go.
Find the Ken Early article there. Also answer my questions in the other post
My respect for Messi would go up even more if he did cause that utter weirdo Guardiola to quit though so I hope proof is found
it canât. if you went up him even more, thereâd be none of you left
Itâs on their podcast about 3 months ago when they are discussing how long pep will stay at city.
So was it on the Irish Times or on their podcast? And who was Ken Earlyâs source?
Guardiola turned Messi into the player he is and outside of the guardiolas years Messi return of one champions league is dreadful. Messi owes pep everything.
The Irish times sponsor their podcast.
No they donât. Who was Ken Earlyâs source?
You said I made it up in my own. You clearly havenât a notion. Messi is a great player but a cunt. His ego is too big. You either pander to Messi or else you fail at Barcelona.
As far as Iâm concerned you did make it up. So far youâve produced one article from a no-mark Swede with no connection to Guardiola or Messi, and even in that article he doesnât mention anything about Guardiola leaving because of Messi
Click onto that link and you will see that the last podcast linked is episode 777. The second captains have over 1500 episodes at the moment. They broke away from the Irish Times ages ago
You are all over the shop. Hans Brooke is not a no mark Swede. He was involved in with New York while Henry and Marquez signed from Barcelona. Pep also lived in the New York for a spell didnât he? He clearly says If Messi, pep or anybody else wanted to sue him they can try but they couldnât because itâs true.
Heâs a no mark, talking on Swedish television trying to big himself up as in the know, like yourself.
He also mentions nothing about Guardiola leaving because of Messi
He clearly states pep knew once Messi was lost it was over. You were wrong. I was right. Messi tryâs to manage the team he plays in. He tried to control the transfers. It doesnât work. Barcelona and Argentina are seriously underachieving.
Lets pretend the anecdote is true. That is from 2008/09, Guardiolaâs first season so it has nothing to do with what happened when Guardiola left.
Why are they both so shit when he doesnât play? Barca overachieve with him, Argentina are about as good as they should be with him. Both are absolutely terrible without him
Messi is basically the manger. Heâs outgrown the teams. It doesnât matter whether heâs injured, playing, on the bench or rested. Barcelona would be as well to get as much for him and sell. Rebuild the club and the team without his toxic presence. He is merely hindering the process that needs to happen. Itâll only get worse as he gets older. Heâs a great player but his ego out grew his ability. He isnât a leader and all told since pep has left his career has been poor. One champion league is an awful return.
How many Champions Leagues does Guardiola have since he stopped managing Messi?