Thinly veiled âstop engaging with him as heâs making a fool of youâ.
1 Like
I will happily let any reasonable poster on here decide whoâs won this argument, you dont decide it yourself you fool. Constantly stating youâre winning doesnt prove anything.
Ive said numerous times the invasion turned out to be a disaster. But better managed it could have been a fantastic result, an end to a murderous despot. You are happy that hed be there killing away to this very day. By your reckoning, no one should ever be over thrown, regardless of their crimes, because in your opinion, you never know, what replaces him could be worse. You are a coward. And a terrible debater, ive answered all your âpointsâ youve ignored mine, lets not forget pulling posters up on grammatical or spelling errors was your earlier strategy. But you think youâve made a fool of me.
*Comment from here down withdrawn, they were bad minded.
Oops.
And that right there, is an admission of total defeat.
I havenât once pulled you up on a spelling or grammatical error.
Keep imagining things.
Just an admission that I was a fool for arguing with a sad weird individual. Iâll let another poster decide the victor, but here you are claiming victory, yet again. I wouldnât wish it on anyone, but reading back your posts have been an astounding example of ignoring whatâs written, just powering on anyway, name calling and smiley faces. youve spent your new year just shrieking, ignoring, and making up what I said. You were all high and mighty a few posts back, until I proved you had no issue with Saadam continuing his murderous regime. What a backtrack. You kinda seem beyond help to be honest.
You are arguing with someone who just admitted to being plastered after drinking a few sherries. Think long and hard about that.
Iâm arguing with someone who is quite possibly an alcoholic shut in. I need my head examined for engaging him
There is no point mate.
Iâm too drunk to read paragraphâs but still reckon Iâm 55% right. Both of ye should have a beer and enjoy the new year.
The thing is you end up realizing you are mostly arguing with yourself. There is clearly no obviously easy answer to these problems, but these extreme leftie types are defined by having no answers or laughably naĂŻve answers. Embrace moderate muslims, ffs. Moderate muslims are happy to live in the west and enjoy the freedoms of the west, but refuse to confront the insanity of the religion they themselves embrace. The only oneâs worth embracing are the reformist muslims, who want to discard all the 7th century madness in their religion (Mohammedâs Medina phase) and retain the essentially JC like philosophy (Mohammedâs Mecca phase). Itâs really that simple, but pandering to the religion overall isnât the answer.
4 Likes
If you had applied for asylum or were an economic migrant on temporary work permit, Iâd expect you to serve your sentence and be deported straight from prison, as would happen to you in the U.S. Or Australia.
It is exactly what youâd deserve.
2 Likes
You have said that Iraq should have been partitioned. That would have resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent people and created God knows what other problems.
Ultimately the invasion and the policies you advocate killed far more people than Saddam did. You will say that you killed them trying to do a good thing whereas Saddam killed them for an ignoble reason but what difference does that make to the dead?
To try and disguise that by attacking @Sidney for supposedly ignoring Saddamâs evils is really just pathetic.
Grow the fuck up. You canât invade an entire continent. Youâre talking about eternal war, with the deaths of millions upon millions of innocents, for reasons of pretentious sanctimonious wank.
I appreciate that this is supposed to be a friendly forum but ultimately itâs impossible not to have contempt for people like you.
By way of a non sequitur aside, back when he was alive I used to really like Christopher Hitchens but now heâs dead and I can see things clearly Iâm fucking delighted that cunts dead. Fucking egotistical wankstain, Iâm glad he got cancer. At the time I was reading him he had me convinced that we should invade Iran for, in retrospect, basically no reason whatsoever. He would have killed millions of innocent people just because he couldnât deal with his childhood issues with his mothers suicide.
3 Likes
What would have happened to Turkish Kurds if there had have been in independent Kurdistan in Northern Iraq? Do you honestly think that Turkey wouldnât kill a million Kurdish civilians if it had to? And what would you do then, tell us to go to war with Turkey?
The planet is fucking destroyed from despicable know all cunts like you. Youâve a lot in common with the colonials at the end of WW1, the great nation builders who created the modern Middle East in the first place.
That prick Kristol of the Project New American Century started off a similarly not-too-bright know-it-all mouthing off shite online and in magazines, he eventually played a large role in the deaths of millions.
Are you fucking loaded, or are you Sidneyâs alias. What millions would have died setting up three separate states, Sunni, shiâa and Kurd in giving those people exactly what they want. So what would have happened if sadaams regime ever did just disappear into thin air, everthing would have been hunky dory hold hands?
Iraq was drawn in Whitehall, no nation would have been formed with such disparate groups, they would have formed their own independent nations. You think britains colonial map makers should have their pipe dreams held together forever.
The rest of your post about Hutchins is truly weird, deranged, you didnât have to read his writings, or be taken in by them, but you wished cancer on him. Youâre odd pal. And yet again Iâm spending time arguing with odd people.
Reasons of pretentious sanctimonious wank - that would be protecting innocent people from being gassed and killed, thatâs why Saadam had to be deposed. Sanctimonious wank in your eyes.
You are talking to yourself dim wit
2 Likes
Sure, because invading Saudi Arabia isnât a laughably naive answer.
Which we can assume you also advocate.
You expect to be taken seriously when you resort to this, and referencing my trip to Australia?
Seriously?
1 Like
Stop, Christ stop. Donât ever reply to me or quote me again, until the ignore function magically returns, steer clear, please
Iâll quote you right here.
When you stray off the topic and bring what you think is somebodyâs personal life into a debate, youâve automatically lost. Iâve no problem with you taking the piss over my trip to Australia elsewhere on the forum (start a thread about it if youâre so inclined, by all means, Iâm quite thick skinned), but if youâre using it as a tool to try and debate this topic, it says a lot about the paucity of your argument.
If you want to run away, by all means do so.
1 Like
You mentioned I was in British Columbia. But again, stop, leave me alone, yes Iâm running away, you win, you are a brilliant debater.