May has more questions to answer than Hollande.
The Paris attacks were mainly planned in Belgium.
Hollande's approval ratings went down to 4% after the attacks there and he knew there was no point standing for re-election.
Yet this talking parrot of a British PM is laughably trying to claim that she's "strong on national security", backed up by a fanatical Tory press that would still eulogise her if she took a shit on the pavement outside 10 Downing Street live on TV, much like you still would.
In your answer there, you basically admit by your deflections (Again! Have you ever posted and not deflected?!) that May has serious questions to answer, which she has not answered.
If Corbyn was PM, had made the cuts May made and these attacks had happened under his watch, people like you would be baying for his blood. And in that hypothetical situation, you'd have a point.
There is no hypothetical as regards May. This is reality.
What the fuck the Anglo-Irish agreement has to do with this, I haven't a clue.
Yet again, more classic bait and switch from Timmyanne Conway when you haven't a leg to stand on.