4 to 1 seems generous to the cyclists
Pure milage suits a few rotten bastards on hereā¦
In a month
Which is easier - cycling 30km within an hour, or running 7.5km within an hour, because thatās what it is
Is there a timed element?
The cyclists are hard done by there.
30km an hour on the bike is hard effort, equal at 12k ran in the hour.
But anybody who isnāt a disaster could hop on a good bike and cycle 50k without stopping, not many could run 12.5
are we going for quantity or quality
There is not a timed element. Itās about getting out and exercising as much as your schedule allows, and perhaps challenging yourself to do more than you would in a regular March. Simple as. I run more regularly than cycle as I donāt have the time to cycle.
The 4:1 was suggested as thatās what Tris work off (cc @cluaindiuic). Itās been all about running since the first challenge and the option of this was to allow those who donāt want to run to participate.
Could you add a cooking element? Itās something I want to get more into but Iāve always struggled for confidence and motivation.
No.
It does. I would imagine any Sunday cyclist would do 60 - 80km easy?
Youāre asking a man who thinks a Supermacs Quarter Pounder meal is high cuisine
Bikes have no place on TFK.
Cyclists are cooonts.
Vote with your running feet so
fookin mamils
Even so. Youād want to be running 100km a week to be within an asses roar of me, and thatās just me tipping away, if I was motivated Iād throw in a few handy double centuries on top to pad the mileage.
Btw, active travel should count for double, cc @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy
Go for it pal.
The amount of arguments on TFK, you wouldnāt be the better from it all.
The secret to eternal happiness is not to argue with fools
this all started with running. just leave it at that. set up a cycling lockdown challenge for those wanting to throw cycling into the mix.