Oswald was hyped up by the Southern Media. His cousin Naoise McGonagle-Oswald was a far better marksman
2 Likes
The rest is history pod determined all these conspiracy theories were nonsense.
3 Likes
That isn’t what I asked for.
If shot 1 was at 0.00 seconds and the stopwatch counts from there, what where the time gaps to shot 2 and shot 3?
In your understanding.
So Oswald who was sitting and waiting to shoot missed his first shot… the one where he had the most time and presumably didn’t pull the trigger till he had a clear kill shot- but misses… but then in the next 7 seconds where he had to reload twice, his shot got better.
1 Like
He was a bit like Andy Cole.
3 Likes
This whole thing needs a TFK Commission of Enquiry.
Bound to get a definite solution. I’d make a number of suggestions:
You get yourself appointed Chairperson.
The junior TreatyStones compile a set of drawings and positions around Dealy Plaza.
2 Likes
Andrew
1 Like
A lot of elite FCA marksmen here
3 Likes
As someone with a military background i can confirm that we are trained not to miss but while it happens, our kill rate is much higher off our first shot.
4 Likes
Nitrate tests say Oswald didn’t fire the rifle at all. He had traces from a pistol only. It was a hired French Canadian infamous trigger man who did it as the files will show
That brings the level of experience the Warren commission was lacking.
We could have this resolved within a week.
A lot of theories work on the potential footage filmed by this unknown women. Could prove or disprove LHO made the shot the killled jkf
Trudeau’s oul’ fella presumably, sacre bleu
Trump’s going to look pretty foolish if Ted Cruz’s ould lad is not implicated
1 Like
How would I know, I wasn’t even born.
There was no sound on the video, so it’s all here-say.
That’s a genuine interview and timeline above as best anybody can know.
Yea. And some say he was a crack shot and others say he was useless.
If Oswald wanted to kill Kennedy he would have fired his shots as the cavalcade was turning onto Houston avenue and the shot was becoming closer and easier. He could have got off multiple rds. It was a head on shot. Not as the cavalcade was moving away from him on Elm St towards the underpass and getting progressively harder. Theres not a snowballs chance in hell there was only 1 shooter.
4 Likes
Agree with a lot of that. If he was a marks man as some claim , he took on the worst possible shot, missed initially, but gets better the harder the kill shot became.
1 Like
OK, but you posited earlier that Oswald couldn’t have got the shots away in the time required when he could easily have done it. He had a minimum of 8.3 seconds to do so and it’s likely there were up to 11 seconds between the first and third shots.
He had not only had the accuracy to make the hits but he had the time, ample time.
CBS recreated the assassination in 1967 and found that six seconds was plenty time. There are so many mistaken assumptions about all this based on nonsense spread by people who stand to make money. It’s a massive industry.
It’s blindingly obvious Oswald fired three shots and there were three shots only because all evidence says so. There’s no evidence to even suggest anybody else was involved.
I’m not quite sure what “files” Trump is “planning” to release or whether he will - he promised to release stuff before and did not - but you can be sure he’d do so for one reason and one reason only, because they likely contain a lot of crap, and are likely to fuel yet more baseless conspiracy nonsense that Trump will try and use to his advantage politically.
Fascists use conspiracy fantasism as a means of control of the population to get them to look away from the grotesque shit the fascists are inflicting on ordinary people. Many ordinary people become so consumed with conspiracy fantasism they don’t care about anything else and become cultists for the very people who are making their lives a misery and trapping them in that web of conspiracy fantasism.
If anything is released, very few people will even read it - and the most vocal conspiracy fantasists won’t - but they will pretend to have read it and pick out certain lines and take them as “proof” of a conspiracy or a second shooter or that Oswald didn’t do it or whatever crap they want to believe. That’s what conspiracy fantasists do with every other conspiracy fantasy they decide to believe in with the zeal of a religious cultist. Sure look at Covid - has there ever been more crap written by know nothing morons about something they’ve no wish to have even a single clue about?
It is a common misconception that the records relating to the assassination of President Kennedy are in some way sealed. In fact, the records are largely open and available to the research community here at the National Archives at College Park in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Record Collection.
Congress created the Kennedy Collection when it passed the Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. This statute directed all Federal agencies to transmit to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) all records relating to the assassination in their custody. The Kennedy Act also created a temporary agency, the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), to ensure that the agencies complied with the Act.
In addition to records already open at NARA prior to the passing the Kennedy Act, the Collection now consists of previously withheld records of the Warren Commission, records of the Office of the Archivist, and newly released materials from the Kennedy, Johnson, and Ford Presidential Libraries. Other agency records in the Collection include records of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, records of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and a small amount of material from a variety of other agencies, including the Office of Naval Intelligence. The Collection now includes over five million pages of records.
With a very few exceptions, virtually all of the records identified as belonging to the Kennedy Collection have been opened in part or in full. Those documents that are closed in full or in part were done so in accordance with the Kennedy Act, mentioned above. According to the Act, no record could be withheld in part or in full, without the agreement of the ARRB. The guidelines for withholding records are outlined in the provisions in Section 6 of the Act. The full report of the ARRB is available online. A copy of the Act is in 
Appendix C of the ARRB Report mentioned above. In all cases where the ARRB agreed to withhold a record or information in a record, they stipulated a specific release date for the document. In addition, according to Section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, all records in the Kennedy Collection will be opened by 2017 unless certified as justifiably closed by the President of the United States.
1 Like