Sidney:
Was there a point to this post except “I don’t like you, and even though you’re correct, I’m still going to moan, about what I don’t know, but I’m doing it anyway.”
Because apart from that, it says precisely nothing.
Actually the point is right there. Glas is clearly being disingenuous but he hasn’t got to the levels you have on here. A quick browse of your statements are as follows;
Sidney:
Amazing how so many of the self professed “law and order” brigade want to rip up due process when it suits them.
The problem with reactionary right wingers is that they eventually run of out of other people to lump the problems they created onto.
Here’s you on the British case, shoehorning is some complete shite onto the topic.
The racist, colonial arrogance of the Brits over this Shamima Begum case is fucking astounding.
“Hey, Bangladesh, listen up! We’re stripping this brown girl of her citizenship - explicity against our own counter-terrorism strategy - and we expect you, our former colony, to pick up the tab and take her in. We don’t care that she’s never even been to Bangladesh. This is on your heads now. Know your place, piccaninnies, and do what your rightful master Britain tells you to do.”
“Oh, and any chanc…
The lesson here is that racist, imperialist scumbags like you think it’s just fine for Britain to pass its own security problems onto former colonies, despite those former colonies having absolutely nothing to do with them.
Because, they’re, well, little people.
And sure all those Muslims and brown people are the same, really, aren’t they? Or something something.
So basically you’re in agreement that it’s a decision motivated by throwing a bone to the frothing right wing racist Tory mob, and not the rule of law.
Thanks for that.
Hundreds of male ISIS fighters have been allowed back into the UK with barely a word said.
But as soon as a 19 year old woman tries to get back into her country, she’s portrayed as a “Jihadi Bride” who must be stripped of her legal rights.
Funnily enough, Jacob Rees-Mogg actually got this issue spot on on Question Time last week - it’s just a pity he went on to defend concentration camps later on in the same programme.
You are incapable of staying in lane on the topic.
Forget about international law for a second, do you think it is reasonable to be wary of allowing people who go off to fight in Syria, who say the Manchester Bombings were justified etc?