The Dunph is not an alright sort?

Things
321

[quote=“The Dunph”]The lads are getting seriously worried as we approach the finishing line.

They’ll be left with some egg on their faces if this doesn’t go as they planned.

http://www.easyfreesmileys.com/smileys/lol-057.gif[/quote]

Well not really like.
Either way it looks like it will be very close.

Also, I have not been contacted by anyone about any kind of plan around this thread. I’m just having a bit of a laugh with it. I’m sure art and T_E can say the same.

It seems like you have gone to an awful amount of trouble of possibly creating new aliases and possibly getting users with multiple aliases to rake up their alter egos to get you over the line.

Maybe Julio could decide to base the decision not on the number of votes but the cumalative total of posts by posters who voted in each category.

Say you do “win”…

At the end of the day at least 20 people are saying you are a bit of a mong.

So if you want to celebrate that, be my guest.

322

there are no winners here, none at all.

i shudder to think of the fall-out from this poll.

323

[quote=“treaty_exile”]there are no winners here, none at all.

i shudder to think of the fall-out from this poll.[/quote]

Exactly T_E, exactly.

324

I’d like to thank jimmy cooneys watch for exercising his democratic right.

massey ferguson. what were you thinking?

20-20 and never have so many had their vision questioned.

325

I hope I’m wrong cluain, I really do.

And yet, already the fall-out from Dunph’s folly is beginning to reveal itself.

SS**, Runt and Rintintin have yet to return to the forum.

A well-placed source suggests that even a grovelling apology at this late stage may not be enough to heal the divisions in west limerick.

tensions continue to run high, rumours of an impending family engagement being put on hold have yet to be confirmed, but are certainly understandable given the significance of recent events.

I only hope more serious repurcussions do not follow.

326

The city of Limerick will never be the same again.

327

We’ve been down before sledge.

But I’m not sure we’ve been quite so low.

I only hope that some well-meaning individuals, possibly with dual allegiances (perhaps a committee consisting of thrawneen, soul dressing and your good self) could take matters in hand and see if anything can be done.

328

I will make inquiries. People are angry though. Very angry. We might have to wait a while, and hope that things die down slightly.

329

[quote=“cluaindiuic”]Also, I’m sure Julio will agree with the points I made regarding dunph’s own participation in this thread and will make it 21-19.

Noddy, sid and sledge all need to clearly state their second preferences also.[/quote]

2nd prerfernce for what??

330

[quote=“treaty_exile”]We’ve been down before sledge.

But I’m not sure we’ve been quite so low.

I only hope that some well-meaning individuals, possibly with dual allegiances (perhaps a committee consisting of thrawneen, soul dressing and your good self) could take matters in hand and see if anything can be done.[/quote]

You can count sledge out anyway, he’s already made his feelings known.

Thrawneen and Soul Dressing are both reasonable individuals however who may be able to see sense.

331

Don’t take any notice of him noddy, you’ve already voted. He’s trying to soil votes.

332

my 2nd prefernce is

''No the once alright sort dunph has been walking around holding NCC’s pocket ala Teabag for too long ‘’

333

[quote=“cluaindiuic”]Well, this really all comes down to Julio’s polling system.

If it is the Single Member Plurality “First-past-the-post” system made famous by the IOTM polls that I was instrumental in inventing[in an Al Gore sense] then you are right Dump.

But if Julio has chosen to use the Single Transferable Vote system then at a certain juncture the votes of the lowest scoring option will be added to the remaining option of the voters choosing.

For the record, if Julio does go with this system, my vote will join the “No the once alright sort dunph has been walking around holding NCC’s pocket ala Teabag for too long” camp.[/quote]

Hey Noddy, see above…

334

[quote=“noddy”]my 2nd prefernce is

''No the once alright sort dunph has been walking around holding NCC’s pocket ala Teabag for too long ‘’[/quote]

Sledge, as you are online, can you declare your 2nd preference.

335

[quote=“noddy”]my 2nd prefernce is

''No the once alright sort dunph has been walking around holding NCC’s pocket ala Teabag for too long ‘’[/quote]

Sorry noddy you’ve already voted for “the dunph was never an alright sort”.

While we’re at it why don’t we ask people voting yes or no in the Lisbon Treaty for their second preference as well. :guns:

336

[quote=“The Dunph”]Sorry noddy you’ve already voted for “the dunph was never an alright sort”.

While we’re at it why don’t we ask people voting yes or no in the Lisbon Treaty for their second preference as well. :guns:[/quote]

Rubbish argument.

As already argued earlier, answer me this Dump:
Do you get three options in the Lisbon Treaty or two?

337

No point sledge… You’ve already voted.

Chris Tarrant: “So for 1million Cluiandick your final answer is (a)?”
Cluaindick: “That’s correct Chris but just in case that doesn’t work out to my liking my second preference is (b).”

1 Like
338

[quote=“The Dunph”]
Thrawneen and Soul Dressing are both reasonable individuals however who may be able to see sense.[/quote]

I just hope the same may be said of you Dunph.

339

He’s not trying to spoil anyone’s vote Dunph
(and while we’re on the topic, I wouldn’t wipe my arse with your vote)

340

[quote=“The Dunph”]No point sledge… You’ve already voted.

Chris Tarrant: “So for 1million Cluiandick your final answer is (a)?”
Cluaindick: “That’s correct Chris but just in case that doesn’t work out to my liking my second preference is (b).”[/quote]

Stop going off on a tangent and answer the question…