You were right the first time though.
He has the look of a guilty man about him but if he was then why hasnât he been charged?
To answer my own question.
"Under French law, anyone found guilty of a crime in absentia is entitled to a second trial in France where they will be present in court and represented by defence lawyers. "
So ah, when he rang the other couple and said a french woman was found dead, before it was announced on the news, where did that info come from? And the cuts on his arm from climbing a christmas tree? And him disappearing for a few hours to do a bit of writing, contradicting an earlier account? Some awful harmless lads on here
Like yourself who take the totally discredited Garda investigation as the gospel. DPP took one look and said no fucking way
If you cant disprove any points all you have to do is say that, no need to jump in and defend the dpp just because you get coffee for them. The guards fucked up parts, the farrell one being a complete fruitcake discredited a lot but that doesnât affect the evidence thats there. Not enough for a prosecution but very questionable. But trying to look smart is more important than justice in your book, the same attitude throughout the law library you wish you were part of
You clearly havenât the first clue about the case, so Iâll leave you alone in your little Iâll educated bubble/hedge.
Again no points or argument just sneering, a quick retreat from you too, no shock there
What purports to be a criminal justice system in France is some joke.
You didnât deal with much in your first post apart form sneering about me wanting to be a barrister, again a fallacy, Iâd suggest you have a look at the evidence from Baileyâs civil proceedings which were statute barred and the DPP comments.
You flailing and floundering all over the place here pal.
Still no reply, donât be trying to engage if youâre not able you come across as a mouthpiece
Iâve told you where to look, if youâre incapable of looking at that then youâre at nothing.
Youâre the one making out he knows it all but have just offered a bit of pompous sneering. So the couple who said bailey told them about a woman being found, before it was announced (where he said he heard) explain that one
I heard frank buttimer earlier on local radio, he was absolutely livid!!
I donât think bailey had anything to do with tbh, frenchies looking to close the case and be done with it, unreal that Ms du plantier was murdered 23 years ago next week
Frank has ran into a lot of dead ends with Ian Bailey. That Civil Case he took on in the High Court ran for something like 64 days and then at the very end Baileyâs case was thrown out on a statute of limitations issue with a costs order against Bailey. I hope someone somewhere is picking up the tab for Frank and the blue chip service that heâs provided.
Some would say the unfortunate Ms. Du Plantier ran into one with him too
So, being the countryâs foremost site for wild unsubstantiated heresy, conjecture, and speculation, who do we actually think killed Ms du plantier?
A Cork Weirdo , but that doesnât narrow it down
Have you listened to the West Cork podcast series?
While I donât know who killed Sophie, I am fairly convinced that Ian Bailey most certainly did not. He is definitely guilty of being a narcissist oddball but he didnât commit this murder.