You claimed on here last week to be a qualified and experienced âphysiology coachâ or something ridiculous like that.
I googled the term and im afraid there are no qualifications in reallife universities to match this âprofessionâ you have and on that basis it is very clear that what you claim to be is completely made up. You are a snakeoil salesman who is scamming stupid and vulnerable people with a title that means absolutely nothing.
Donât get me wrong, i admire anyone who can make a few bob out of nothing.
@caoimhaoin has the lateral thinking he told us himself so maybe he should spend less time doing construction nixers and concentrate on getting some formal recognised qualifications to go with it if he is going to be challenging the medical doctors and the physios.
Births led by midwives lead to greater adverse outcomes for babies
We examined data on all full-term births in which no serious abnormalities were detected in the baby that occurred in New Zealand over a 5-y period (total sample size 244,047).
We compared rates of adverse outcomes for unborn and newly born infants among women who were in midwife-led versus medical-led care at first registration during antenatal care.
Overall rates of adverse outcomes in the New Zealand setting were low and comparable to international rates.
We found that, among mothers with medical-led care compared with midwife-led care, there were lower odds of some adverse outcomes for infants. These included oxygen deprivation during the delivery (birth-related asphyxia) (55% lower odds), neonatal encephalopathyâa condition that can result in brain injury (39% lower odds), and low Apgar score, which is a measure of infant well-being immediately postdelivery, with a low score being indicative of an unwell baby (48% lower odds).
Its a study by hospital professionals wanting to promote hospitals essentially.
Plenty science is utter bullshit. After a quick look this one has the âcoloured to suit ourselvesâ look all over it. Notwithstanding the fact that its way of calculating post birth issues was simply on a discussion basis.
How were they calculating all the parameters at the home births?
Study by academics who received no specific funding
About the Authors
Ellie Wernham
E-mail: ellie.wernham@otago.ac.nz
Affiliation Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Jason Gurney
Affiliation Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
James Stanley
Affiliation Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-1047
Lis Ellison-Loschmann
Affiliation Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
Diana Sarfati
Affiliation Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Competing Interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
All from the Public health dept. The same place. Its like the CUH asking UCC to do a study for them. The fuckers go for pints together every friday where the academics slag the docs for taking the gard life and the docs slag the academics for being lazy gits.
Who pays the wages. Follow the money. Always follow the money.
Its a very wishy washy study that the authors had no real direct involvement in. Just picked thru a selective bunch of records
A great example if you want to believe something hard enough there will be some study to support it. The fact it took this long to poke it out says it all.
