Itās an odd looking pram.
Yes I saw the contradiction in the piece and pointed it out. Itās typical tabloid.
Get off your high horse there, as if I would ever go to bat for Conor McGregor.
Itās an odd looking pram.
Yes I saw the contradiction in the piece and pointed it out. Itās typical tabloid.
Get off your high horse there, as if I would ever go to bat for Conor McGregor.
Youd go after a single mother handy enough regardless what the by proxy was.
What?
I donāt think any father should abandon their child and not pay money.
The story is typical tabloid exploitation and written in their own immutable style with a variety of salacious and personal pictures. Thatās really what I was getting at.
You weirdo.
Of course you were. Why not post the full article then? Why go to the trouble of picking those exact extracts?
Why would I post the article, the link is there?
I posted a couple of pieces from it, cāest Ƨa. Youāve got yourself in a tizzy so maybe go lie down.
Oh, so the article was already posted and you decided to highlight that picture and those extracts.
Classy stuff. The Bourgeois is strong with you
I noticed that contradiction too Tim.
I also like that she went back for more as well, just to be sure.
Ka ching
Sheās one for the Rough(ish) birds thread all the same
Heās pointing out that she is a grade a chav who clearly wants money. I canāt see what your difficulty is here.
Sheās given him plenty opportunity to handle the matter privately.
The scumbag didnāt. Look at the head on the child, thereās no DNA test required.
You are spot on here.
McGregor should take responsibility for his actions and he shouldnāt have been having sex with her if he wasnāt man enough to provide for the consequences.
The woman will be put through the ringer, accused of being a tramp, chav and money grabber by the UFC fanboys, all to protect an absolute scumbag
Men abandoning their parental responsibilities are akin to females who decide to have abortions.
Actions have consequences.
The poor lad could have been tricked, seduced and entrapped.
If he did the deed, he bears responsibility.
Thatās completely unrealistic. Sure ghenghis khan would have been out a fortune.
Itās not necessarily a contradiction.
She doesnāt want his money for HERSELF.
She wants his money for her CHILD.
Iāve used BLOCK CAPITALS for impact/effect.
If he didnāt do the deed, heād have nothing to worry about. He lacks self control.