Corrupt??? and i’ve already said I am willing to step down…
Only if you could keep a direct influence on power, much in the same way as Putin held a gun to the head of his direct replacement for one term until he could be relected.
Sadly civil war is normally what is required in order to dispose of a maniacal despotic ruler.
+1 pal.
For the good of the league I am willing to step aside right now if needs be. I’ve already said I would support @count_of_monte_crist 100% in the position.
It’s a no from me.
that’s 6 for no - CM, Bando, Crutches, WYT, Elvis and Matty.
Step completely aside, no meddling?
I never, ever, ever said I would meddle nor would I ever. The messing aside, I am a man of honour and integrity…Segunda first at all times. The new guy would be his own man and I look forward to abusing the bollox off him.
However, there doesn’t seem to be an appetite to change the flex position as you can see - I’m not sure how this new guy could revolutionize the league.
There isn’t an appetite yet but many votes still to be counted, ie the two coming up and two going down. But the majority will decide it. And its not so much a revolution im after, just a purification, a cleansing of unwelcome influences
Lads who are not in the league have no say on the matter, mate… anyway, as you can see by @Chucks_Nwoko’s comments earlier, only a gimp would want a TE in flex position…that’s a damning stance and one he’d hardly row back on… As a matter of interest, @Gman and @Mac- what are your thoughts on TE at flex?
Did you not read the part where I said messing aside? and did i not change it back? Youre an awful fool.
No to Flex TEs.
Messing or not it was still unnecessary meddling that involved you abusing your power.
A proper commish could do no such thing for fear of having the integrity of the Segunda called into question.
Get a grip you cunt. It was a bit of merriment.
TE flex is in the first division since inception. If the fantasy organisers can put some players down as a WR/RB without defining the position, then I think it only fair that some tight ends, who play mostly out of the slot or even as a wideout should be afforded the ability to be placed in a flex position. Jimmy Graham had a prolonged contract negotiation arguing he should be paid as a WR and not a TE. Why should we restrict the modern game where tight ends are much more than a big guy off the line who sometimes block?
In contrary to your point that one or 2 RBs or WRs make it a harder league, I would respectfully disagree. More positions, means more players used, means a far harder league to get points. You have to find the gems and low pick point getters. Having 2 WR’s in your team mean you are guaranteed to draft a starter, so much easier to accumulate points.
In any case, you’re all a bunch of fucking cunts and I look forward to discussing/arguing/shouting next season rather than having no discussion on the other league as half the cunts dont even post here anymore.
Ah it’s always only merriment when you get caught.
You declared Civil War last year when someone left a position blank in Division 1 and had to be pulled into line by your other owners.
You’re a busted flush at this stage.
It was in its bollox, if you weren’t pulled on it it would have continued. You’re a person of questionable character, not fit for commissionership. For that reason i propose @count_of_monte_crist as commish. What say you?
Look who is fucking talking… And you know fucking well I only changed it to wind up Croppy you dipstick.
Wow. What a clamping. Id even forgotten to destroy him on his ludicrous argument that its easier to have to start more players from a limited pool. Welcome aboard mate.
So thats another for TE in the flex.