Also I’ve yet to see conclusive evidence that D’arcy is a father.
Your climbdown was this morning mate, no need to keep digging
[quote=“Mac, post: 99721”]
Your climbdown was this morning mate, no need to keep digging[/quote]
There wasn’t a climbdown mate I just didn’t read the post , you need to review the definition of climbdown
Superbly well played. Much like the Ronan Keating case this one.
I had to go down to the local Garda station the other night to get me passport form stamped. So in I walk and in the reception and there is a woman at the desk ahead of me who I also thought was getting the passport form stamped, but no the stupid bint was filling out the form at the desk and it wasn’t just one form, she was filling out one for her and another for each of her 3 kids and the husband was also there filling out his one. If I was the guard I would have told them to fuck off with their forms and come back when they have been completed and only need to be stamped. It was a fucking family day out to the garda station. :shakefist:
They should have spent the night in a cell for that garbage.
:shakefist: you’re muffcabbage
:shakefist:
Calling someone ‘sport’ on an internet forum
That aimed at me sport?
Badminton.
:rolleyes:
Why and because, sport?
Lonely Planet Ireland citing ‘The Pub’ as the number 1 experience in the country…then putting a picture of that hideous faux sham paddy whack cess pit ‘The Temple Bar’ beside this heading. Wrong.
Calling anyone anywhere sport is right, imo. Makes me think of Taxi Driver when De Niro confronts Keitel. “Don’t know nobody named Iris”
The cheeky bastard!
A MAN who lived in a house for 30 years has squatter’s rights, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A court majority yesterday ruled yesterday Desmond Grogan can continue to live there, although he rents it out .
The court found the Chief State Solicitor cannot pursue a claim for court orders requiring him to give up possession of the house at Enniskerry Road in Phibsboro, Dublin.
The house belonged to 80-year-old barrister, Alice Dolan, who died in October 1981 without making a will.
Mr Grogan broke into the house in February 1982 after learning of Ms Dolan’s death through his auctioneering job and about the apparent absence of any next of kin
Ms Dolan was predeceased by her husband Patrick in 1969.
Letters of administration of Ms Dolan’s estate were executed in July 2000 and granted to the Chief State Solicitor.
The Chief State Solicitor later became the personal representative of Ms Dolan’s estate and issued Circuit Court proceedings in May 2002 seeking orders requiring Mr Grogan deliver up possession.
Mr Grogan disputed the State’s right to possession and argued that as he had lived in the premises since 1982, he had achieved adverse possession, or squatters rights, because he had exceeded the 12-year period required for this.
He also argued Mr O’Hagan was not a “State authority” for the purpose of the Statute of Limitations 1957, with the effect that the 30-year period available to State authorities to pursue an interest in an estate was not available to the Chief State Solicitor.
Legal issues were referredto the Supreme Court and its 2/1 majority ruling yesterday means the State cannot pursue its claim for possession.
The issues concerned the appropriate limitation period within which an action must be brought by a person t o recover lands forming part of the estate of a deceased where the State is the ultimate intestate successor.
All three judges found the Chief State Solicitor is not a “State authority” within the meaning of the Statue of Limitations.
Mr Justice Nial Fennelly and Mr Justice Joseph Finnegan also found the relevant limitation period applying in this case was 12 years, not 30 years.
Ms Justice Fidelma Macken disagreed.
She said Mr Grogan had been “clever” in not joining the Attorney General as a party in his claim for squatter’s rights because this would then have enabled the Chief State Solicitor to raise their interests and address the limitation period.
It is understood Mr Grogan rents the house to a number of tenants. It is believed he also owns a B&B in Drumcondra.
One of the tenants said he was an attentive landlord.
The owner of the house would have been better to walk, claim that he was robbing the house and then shoot him in the back as he fled the scene.
That would have taught him a lesson.
I see what you’re trying to do there, but it doesnt work because the owner was dead.
So the *perp got off on a technicality again? :ph34r:
*spelling mistake correct to avoid confusion
- I have no idea what a ‘purp’ is.
- I have no idea if this ‘purp’ carried out such an act previously for it to be defined as ‘again’.