Can we take it for granted that most of the lads on the banter-bus here have no idea what itâs like to be sexually assaulted by a 23 year old when youâre 16 and basically have no idea what the fuck theyâre on about?
heâs getting all kinds of cyber bullying, being called a rape victim⌠Heâs not emotionally mature enough for all this⌠If it was a 16 year old girl lads here would lose their shit.
It seems like youâd like to re-write the laws of the land according to what you think they should be. I suppose thatâs fair enough. We all would a bit. I guess thatâs why we have laws. And a teacher preying on a kid that age is illegal. It really doesnât matter what you think. Itâs rape. Mostly cos she was in a position of power. Iâm sure he enjoyed it at the time. Id say he regrets it now. But itâs still rape.
Iâm not really that pushed mate, youâre the one going out of your way to defend a paedophile. I thought youâd know what she was found guilty of offhand
It seems bizarre that youâd like to argue about what statutory rape is. Feel free to look up the definition if you donât believe me.(consensual sex with a minor âŚ)
Itâs weird that you felt it was not only ok but righteous to claim a rape in a contested case where a witness suggested consensual sex And the jury agreed but you decided otherwise.
In this case the defendant offered the defence that she thought the legal age was 16. Itâs 17. She had sex with a minor. She now acknowledges this and has expressed remorse. But sure Iâm sure youâre right somewhere. because you keep saying you are.