People have a right to do whatever the fuck they want within the law and not be held in any way “personally responsible” should they be unfortunate enough to be the victim of a crime.
Strange how you’re still focussing on the “personal responsibility” of the victim, not the perpetrator, here.
No I think going back to a stranger’s house, who you’ve just met, under the influence of alcohol is reckless behaviour - particularly for a woman who would be as physically capable of defending herself.
No but it shows incredible weakness on Cusack and Walshes part.
Its weak not to stand up for what you velieve is wrong just because an old friend has now broken your (or societal) rules.
Hooks, while misguided, are nowhere near as damaging.
Personal responsibility is a fucking humongous problem in modern society. And Ireland is even worse, compounded by the lack of responsibikity in for instance the public sector.
Nothing is your fault apparently… Walk up an alley full of junkies in the middle of the night waving 50 Euro notes and it’s not your fault that you got robbed and stabbed.
I’m in agreement with almost all of that as my posts will show, bizarre the assumptions that @HBV can make, the issue of character references is dumb, in a case like that you stand in court on the crime you committed only.
I was just thinking out loud about how you’d react if it was somebody that you cared for, can they really be dead to you or will you allow them any credit for the years of friendship, family bonds etc, I just don’t know for sure,