Twitter (Part 1)

Irene from home and away used work there. She was about 50 and had skin like leather

We all chipped in for one of the lads 21st and gave a her about 100 quid pounds to show him a good time.

He came out ashen faced

Thatā€™s like in Mad Men when Pete bumps into the father in law in a brothel. :flushed:

We used to go on Tuesdays after football game in late 90s as shortly after it opened. It used to be rammed at weekends.

1 Like

Heā€™s seen the opportunity and gone in hard but fair :rofl:

2 Likes

Your 'auld fella a frequenter was he?

Thatā€™s a tough one for Shapiro ha

Yeah but only there to gawp at the friction burns on your Maā€™s thighs.


I believe this was the right decision for Twitter. We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety. Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all.

That said, having to ban an account has real and significant ramifications. While there are clear and obvious exceptions, I feel a ban is a failure of ours ultimately to promote healthy conversation. And a time for us to reflect on our operations and the environment around us.

Having to take these actions fragment the public conversation. They divide us. They limit the potential for clarification, redemption, and learning. And sets a precedent I feel is dangerous: the power an individual or corporation has over a part of the global public conversation.

The check and accountability on this power has always been the fact that a service like Twitter is one small part of the larger public conversation happening across the internet. If folks do not agree with our rules and enforcement, they can simply go to another internet service.

This concept was challenged last week when a number of foundational internet tool providers also decided not to host what they found dangerous. I do not believe this was coordinated. More likely: companies came to their own conclusions or were emboldened by the actions of others.

This moment in time might call for this dynamic, but over the long term it will be destructive to the noble purpose and ideals of the open internet. A company making a business decision to moderate itself is different from a government removing access, yet can feel much the same.

Yes, we all need to look critically at inconsistencies of our policy and enforcement. Yes, we need to look at how our service might incentivize distraction and harm. Yes, we need more transparency in our moderation operations. All this canā€™t erode a free and open global internet.

The reason I have so much passion for #Bitcoin is largely because of the model it demonstrates: a foundational internet technology that is not controlled or influenced by any single individual or entity. This is what the internet wants to be, and over time, more of it will be.

We are trying to do our part by funding an initiative around an open decentralized standard for social media. Our goal is to be a client of that standard for the public conversation layer of the internet. We call it @bluesky:

Unroll available on Thread Reader

https://twitter.com/jack/status/1204766078468911106?s=21

This will take time to build. We are in the process of interviewing and hiring folks, looking at both starting a standard from scratch or contributing to something that already exists. No matter the ultimate direction, we will do this work completely through public transparency.

Itā€™s important that we acknowledge this is a time of great uncertainty and struggle for so many around the world. Our goal in this moment is to disarm as much as we can, and ensure we are all building towards a greater common understanding, and a more peaceful existence on earth.

I believe the internet and global public conversation is our best and most relevant method of achieving this. I also recognize it does not feel that way today. Everything we learn in this moment will better our effort, and push us to be what we are: one humanity working together.

A bit late to be having a look at what passes for conversation Jack

1 Like

Genuine question here. What is the point of a ā€œprivate danceā€?

It makes me a lot more moneyā€¦ .

1 Like

do you bet on private dances ?

1 Like

In Western Europe, none. In Eastern Europe, well, Iā€™ve heard stories

1 Like

Buying my young silence in this instance

2 Likes

If not, it would be the only thing he doesnt bet on.

3 Likes

Would a lad getting a private dance expect a happy ending??
Iā€™m genuinely puzzled by the concept if not.

More of an old dry ride

17 Likes

Very good.