The guffaw, mate, is because a supposedly “impartial” source is using an almost exact wording of a Tory election slogan from 2015.
Also the article, which repeats the same words, is written by a reporter who is widely known to hold Tory-supporting tendencies, and who more importantly, has previously been found to have breached accuracy and impartiality rules in her reporting on Corbyn.
Repeating Tory election slogans is not a generally recognised form of impartial reporting - it’s like something the Daily Mail or The Sun would come up with.
It’s not surprising however, as the Tories have constantly threatened the BBC with losing their licence fees unless the BBC become the sort of organisation the Tories want - ie. a dumbed down, Tory-supporting one.
It’s a Tory election slogan. News organisations shouldn’t use Tory election slogans both as headlines and in the text of an article as “analysis” if they want to retain credibility.
You obviously think they should, but then you would, wouldn’t you.
It’s irrelevant which year the slogan is from, you dimwit.
The BBC is both headlining an article with a Tory election slogan and offering that same slogan as “analysis”.
That’s not journalism - that’s Sun-standard propaganda, and again, it’s no surprise you see no problem with it, given you spent most of the last year shilling for Trump and repeating his campaign slogans like a hyperactive parrot.
Sidney outraged by media bias
Who posts more biased media articles than the rest if the TFK community times 100.
Fuck me, it’s not just bandage that needs help, the whole place is nuts.
Kuenssberg has plenty of form here. Between herself and Nick Robinson, the BBC has been a shameless propaganda tool for the Tories for a long time now.
She should have been sacked after this, if it was pro-Labour stuff she was inventing you bet your life she would have been shit-canned.