And yet they could win neither on their own and both wars signalled irrevocable historical decline for them.
Part of the problem with this sort of historical obsession is that several Tory Prime Ministers, most notably Thatcher, thought they were Churchill in dealing with relatively trivial matters, and made a complete bollocks of things by doing so.
I don’t disagree. My wording was quite specific. People are trying to bend what I said to suit whatever point they are trying to make.
I’ve not seen the film Dunkirk, and have no intention of watching it. It is, however, as authentic I’d imagine as mayweather vs mcgregor. It is there solely to make money. Nothing more.
Glorifying Dunkirk, if that what it does is a bizarre concept. It may, as it should, paint a picture of the absolute futility and horror of warfare. Maybe it will.
If there was ever a lesson , that is it. Nothing more.
It is also quite clear that the Germans could have obliterated the fleets of fishing vessels etc, as well as those stranded on the beach, had they wished.
That they didn’t , speaks for the pilots and commanders involved in that battle.
Personally, I don’t think humans are that different, irish, English, German, all sides of the same coin.
Hopefully it shows the horror of war for what it was - My grandfather was a roaring alco for life with his nerves shot to bits after Dunkirk… Nothing heroic about that.
With the advances in technology, there is far more going on in one day now than in in 400 days in Shakespeare’s time, so we can already say Beckham has had more cultural impact.