What?
huh?
They reckon it was some sort of home made contraption
Today, around 21,000 children died worldwide
Poor Tim can’t understand why people are dragging politics into the murder of a politician.
Would it be fair to say if a Islamic suicide bomber killed 20 people, you’d deflect responsibility from the religion and focus on the Individual?
You and I could be great friends in time. You’re just going to have to try a little bit harder. Imagine it, you could come down to the farm and help out with the TB testing and I could go up for a jaunt in the yacht. That’s a goal you can realise if you start to behave around here.
It’s not politically correct to say that Omar Mateen was influenced by radical Islam. The new narrative that’s emerged, that must be believed, is that he was a gay man (maybe he was) who was so conflicted by having his sexuality suppressed (by radical Islam?) that he just had to go out and shoot 100 people to relieve his stress. Never mind there isn’t one other instance of repressed homosexuals going on a killing rampage.
Maybe Mateen was mentally disturbed, in fact one would have to be completely crazed to carry out such a massacre. Pretending he wasn’t fucked up by his fucked up religion and its crazed radicalized rhetoric is just collective burying of heads in the sand however. The absolute cognitive dissonance of people who say don’t blame the religion (religion of peace ) for this massacre, while the religion calls for the death penalty for gays is astounding.
There appears little doubt that Tommy Mair was mentally ill, a clue is that he was being treated for mental illness. The clueless idiots will try and pin his actions on the democratic desire of a (seemingly) majority of UK citizens to leave the EU.
Don’t be dense Rocko. I agree with discussing it, I’m just laughing at the Guardian who will quickly rush to tell people not to overreact when if there’s the slightest hint that someone form an Islamic bent is involved.
A lot of very well paid diplomats and civil servants are very desperate to keep their jobs.
“So you live in a bedsit,how’s that goin for ye”
Published a full three days after the event Rocko?
So it doesn’t count?
First you criticise the Guardian for politicising a killing of a politician.
Then when that’s too stupid a point of view to defend you claim that was fine after all but they don’t write about Islamic extremism when there’s violence by a Muslim.
Then when you’re presented with an article on that very topic you’re not happy with the timing of it.
You’re trying too hard Timothy.
No Rocko, I was pointing out that within hours the Guardian were politicising the event. The Guardian will be the first though to plead restraint if it’s an Islamic attacks. As it fully suits their agenda here it’s no problem to jump in. Already there is questions over whether this mentally ill person did shout what was claimed earlier.
You posted an article 3 days after the event, well done. Where did I post that they don’t report on extreme Islam?
A politician was murdered. The Guardian didn’t make the story political. It was political from the outset. It takes a special kind of idiot to argue otherwise.
Those left wing bastions Spectator, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail are all pushing the political angle. Only the brilliant mind of TFK’s Tim Riggins sees through this conspiracy.
I know you’re struggling to maintain a consistent opinion on this topic so maybe just refrain from responding again.