Ooooft from Pelosi. It’s true too. Trump sees no problem in increasing security threats to members of the US Congress.
But then again, he’s not representing US interests, is he?
Ooooft from Pelosi. It’s true too. Trump sees no problem in increasing security threats to members of the US Congress.
But then again, he’s not representing US interests, is he?
The US military have no interest in visits from a wizened old bag representing a party that has been hostile towards the military, cut military budgets significantly, and treated veterans so shabbily since Obama took office in 2008.
The current Democratic party, especially it’s new members, have zero interest in US national security, if they had they would fund border security rather than calling for disbanding ICE. Even Obama the “Deporter-in Chief” took immigration seriously, his administration deported 2.4 million illegals between 2009 - 2016.
Didn’t Trump outline reduction of mmigrants and deportation as a major goal in his electoral campaign?
He can’t even do that as well as Obama
Send the auld hag over on a commercial airliner. Its good enough for her type
It’s true that deportations decreased from 2016 to 2017, but 2018 was a record year.
Obama deserves a lot of credit though for taking illegal immigration seriously.
She should stay at home, nobody in uniform wants to see her.
The BuzzFeed article that our resident pretend journalist posted was written by Jason Leopold. Yes, that Jason Leopold, who has a history of plagiarizing others work, lying, publishing sourceless material, and in his own words “getting all the facts wrong”. Oh, and being fired from every reputable news outlet he works for, which is why he is at BuzzFeed, a digital rag.
It’s no wonder @Sidney and the scumbag Democrats like him
Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again - Columbia Journalism Review
Hold on, your holding up the white house as a bastion of truth and honesty. Is it just because it suits your argument? Aren’t you usually accusing the white house of lying
Have you worked it out yet?
Source for the White House confirming the story? Or is it sourceless like Jason Leopold?
The White House has said that its ludicrous that anyone would take BuzzFeed seriously.
Interesting that you who profess to have qualifications in journalism, would believe a story by a notorious lying plagiarizing sack of shit who has been been exposed many times for sourceless reporting.
That your a gobshite. Yep its not that hard to figure out.
The White House has denied the story, thus confirming its authenticity.
The White House has ZERO credibility.
At every stage of this proceess they’ve been wrong, and you, have have hung on their every word, have been wrong. And boy are you angry about it.
It must be hard for you when your whole worldview comes crashing down around you in flames?
You need to calm down before you have another mental breakdown.
Wrong again, as always when it comes to anything US related. The White House actually haven’t denied the story, which the MSM will undoubtedly decide means it’s true.
It’s no wonder you are a failed journalist when you believe any old shit you read that confirms your Marxist worldview.
Lolzers
You sound even more demented than normal.
Has Trump been consulted about this?
Is he in on it?
The Republicans did just lift sanctions on Deripaska, like.
I suppose Republicans are alright with the gulag (or worse) when they figure it might cover up their collusion and conspiracy.
Are you Jason Leopold? How many news outlets have you been fired from for lying and plagiarizing? You certainly fit the profile as your journalism skills seem limited to cut and paste, and quoting nutters.
Change the subject, quick.
Yes. I have 114 caps for the England rugby team and was the finest prop forward of my generation.
Swing low, sweet chariot.
Are you Sarah Huckabee Sanders?