He would only go down with a Republican ship, was the Titanic a racist vessel full of hate?
You truly are exposing yourself as a sad demented moron.
Well it was built in East Belfast, and there are people lighting bonfires in that part of the world at this very moment who have a very similar mindset to him.
It makes sense now alright.
You voted for Trump didn’t you?
Sorry to burst your bubble, but no I didn’t. I voted for your fellow pothead Gary Johnson, I’m sure you’d approve.
I’m an independent thinker and voter, and have voted for Democrats at the local and national level far more frequently than Republican. In fact I can’t think of the last Republican I voted for.
Don’t let reason cloud your opinion though, but continue on your merry way being influenced by the forum’s resident nutcase who appears to have mislaid his medication this week.
With respect, mate. If you defend a Trump administration its you who needs Meds.
I find it funny how you take aim at opinions which differ to yours on American Politics when you voted for a Pothead.
With respect mate, you know as much about US politics as my dog. I take aim at opinions on US politics from people who haven’t a notion what they are talking about.
The pothead was preferable to the other alternatives, plain and simple.
Would you fuck off with yourself.
The notion that @anon7035031 voted for anybody else except Trump is incredibly far fetched.
One doesn’t obsessively defend somebody they don’t support in the face of evidence of corruption, collusion, ignorance, stupidity and incompetence which is overwhelming and growing by the day.
He is a truly bizarre character who should be in a straitjacket in an asylum.
A tedious, humourless bore with the zeal of an utter fanatic, yet conversely, the biggest example of cognitive dissonance I’ve ever seen.
It’s for the best that he’s out of this country, really, because we’re all a little bit safer with people like him not around.
I pity those who actually have to live or work or interact with him in real life, however.
Hopefully that’s not a high number of people.
When have you ever actually expressed an opinion on US politics on this thread? The answer is never, as you haven’t a notion.
As for taking aim at opinions that differ from mine, what’s unusual about that, given that the forum’s resident nutcase is a hard leftist and I am a moderate slightly right of center free thinker. The lefty nutcases always try and paint everyone to the right of them, i.e. most rational people, as extreme.
So you’re admitting the Trump’s were telling the truth?
Leaving aside @sidney’s language issues, Trump associates have never denied having business dealings with Russians, and why would they? Literally every medium to large size corporation in the US and Europe have business dealings with Russians. What Trump and his associates deny is that they assisted Russia in hacking the DNC server and hacking John Podesta’s emails (assuming for the sake of the argument that the Russians were responsible) to influence the election. To date, there is zero evidence to back up these allegations, and once again anyone who believes the hackers needed help is a moron given what actually transpired (the DNC “hack” was likely a leak by a Bernie Sanders supporter, and the clown Podesta was a victim of a phishing scam).
Trump associates and campaign team members have continually covered up and denied meetings with Russians which have continually been proven to have happened.
Welcome back from Mars.
President Trump is playing a blinder against the Fake News media.
It’s hilarious how the left have downgraded their expections from “meeting with Russian government personnel” to now “a meeting with a Russian citizen”.
Sure must be
His son is made up and doesn’t exist?
Duh
Serious question @Sidney,
Would you’ve preferred Trumps camp to have taken Hilarys hawkish stance on the Russians?
What do hawkish and dovish mean? I’ve been working in banking and financial services for nearly 20 years and I always wondered when either term was used in relation to interest rates and/or fx rates or whatever but I never bothered to ask anyone before.
Hawkish in political terms basically means advocating an aggressive foreign policy mate.
In other words looking to start a war.