This is a new low.
1 Like
But Iâm not. Iâm objectively correct.
We donât talk about Nazi Germany and say there were a lot of decent Hitler supporters.
Neither should we talk about a paedophile and say âthere were a lot of decent supporters of the paedophileâ.
We should call them what they are. Supporters of a paedophile. If somebody supports a paedophile they are obviously fine with the paedophilia. Itâs completely indivisible from who that person is.
And that goes for every Trump supporter on earth.
And this is obviously entirely different to somebody supporting a football team.
Accoriding to Juhyâs logic, all Manchester United supporters are thus automatically supporters of the Glazers and Jim Ratcliffe.
My faith in the intelligence of TFK supporters has bene badly shaken by all this.
I think there are an awful lot more genuinely stupid people on here than I imagined.
4 statements of fact and 1 inference. Youâll notice your sister didnât deny any of it. Youâre perfectly fine with Sid relentlessly calling another poster a child abuser and a danger to his wife so fuck off with your fake indignation. Ye are like the Americans outraged when people pointed out words Charlie Kirk actually said after he died.
10 Likes
My on the nose analysis of the horrific psychological processes at play with supporters of the paedophile Trump has so outraged @Horsebox that heâs now throwing around baseless paedophilia accusations at me.
For @Horsebox, the most important thing is that paedophiles and indeed supporters of paedophilia face no scrutiny and no accountability.
And the best way to do that is to throw around baseless paedophilia accusations at somebody when you have no argument against them.
Iâd watch @Horsebox. Heâs a wrong 'un, as they say. And hopefully the Gardai will be doing that.
A new low is when a poster doxxed half the forum because they were banned. A new low was when the same poster went on to RIP.ie to get family details of another poster on here and posted them up. A new low was when the same poster created a fake twitter page in the real name of another poster on here to go after their job and family. A new low was when the same poster posted up a picture of another firumite in his work uniformâŚThe constant peado jibes, changing threads titles and destroying every thread with far right peado nazi by the same were new lows ⌠half the forum has left or rarely post because of one lunatic. The same lunatic you and others constantly enable. So if you want to talk about new lows look in the mirror you virtue signalling wanker. Of course @Rocko and @Bandage are equally to blame. Theyâve only banned or reduced posting privileges of the people who dare try and give it back to said poster⌠and donât worry, I know the drill Rocko, if I donât like it I can fuck off, which i will. Good luck managing the remnants of this shitpile youâve left develop.
25 Likes
22 hours at least. Two hours shut eye.
Post of the year!
Viva la Revolution!! Viva THE Side Group!!!
3 Likes
Not only are you a fantasist but you have been one of the most toxic presences on this forum for well over a decade.
It would be a much better forum without you.
As lots of different wise men who were all the same man said:
Irish liverpool fans who picked a random english team shouldnt be reminded that the team they picked has the worst hooligan record in football ?
Its the incessant nature of it tho. Id say very few people read your posts anymore as they are juat rants into the abyss with nazi pedos the whole time. You can dislike Trump, his politics, his supporters, his country whatever as much as you like, but the constant references to everything about nazi pedos just means people skip over your posts. Or have you on ignore, which im sure you dont mind, but anyway.
6 Likes
Yes. Every single time a poster who supports a paedophile posts, that is what they should be reminded of.
That theyâre a supporter of a paedophile. And that theyâre just fine with the paedophilia.
Because itâs objectively true.
Iâd be very intrigued to see if a poster here registered to post in support of Jeffrey Donaldson, how theyâd be received.
Presumably @Horsebox would be very strident in his belief that the hypothetical Donaldson supporter should be allowed post without challenge, that that poster would a ârespectedâ member of the âcommunityâ, just as normal as anybody else, just that the poster supports a paedophile, and letâs all move on.
You called Labane a nonce last night you freak. Your high horse act wonât work here you fucking deviant no matter what the sisters say.
1 Like
Can you link the quote?
Labane has consistently tried to absolve the paedophile Trump.
You just baselessly called me a paedophile.
Yet youâre on here complaining about people being called paedophiles.
How does that work?
Iâd say your IQ is about 43. One point below Labaneâs.
I think sid has crossed lines loads of times and I donât condone it. What I think is pathetic is the effort to anonymously aggravate a person who is clearly suffering from mental illness. Itâs easy ignore or avoid engaging if you want. Iâm sure @Horsebox feels like real big man after it. Hopefully he finds an injured dog on the ground to kick on the way home, thatâll really make his day.
Yet unlike the people who quoted the horrific words of Charlie Kirk, you canâ't quote anything you find objectionable.
Anonymously aggravateâŚfuck off you wanker. What do you think you do all the time on here? Unless glasagusban is your real name? You think the deviant Sid should get a pass on anything he says or does but I and many other posters would disagree. The two of you and a couple of other posters have absolutely ruined this forum which is why half the forum have either left or have ye wankers on ignore.
6 Likes
âYOUâVE ruined the forumâ says @Horsebox.
The below is apparently the very essence of great forum bantz and âdeserves a passâ because @Horsebox said so.
More posts like the below are what we need if weâre to MAKE TFK GREAT AGAIN.
Real big man. Iâm sure youâre real proud of yourself.
There you go @Cheasty.
That post is objectively true.
Whatâs your position on having a hypothetical pro-Jeffrey Donaldson or hypothetical pro-Jimmy Savile poster here?
Sounds like an ideal task for @Kyle given his many burner accounts here.