Russia has been involved militarily for at least a year now on Assadâs side and the war is still going on. There are numerous other outside actors - Turkey, the Gulf states, Iran, the Kurds. Syriaâs geographical position leaves it far more vulnerable to these outside actors in a way that, say, Egypt or Libya havenât been.
The least worst outcome at this stage is probably Assad winning, but then again his atrocities have probably been the worst of any side in the Syrian war, worse than ISIS even. Heâs an utterly cuntish war criminal. The whole thing is an utter shit show and itâll likely take decades to sort out.
Pilger is silent on Russiaâs involvement. Itâs 100% legitimate to criticise the USâs foreign policy under Obama, but itâs simply dishonest to give a one-sided view of interventionism (ie. US bad, Russia good) as Pilger does in that article, or to claim âObama founded ISISâ, or that Syria wouldnât have been a long-running war regardless of any US involvement, or that Russia arenât just as reckless and brutal as the US in their worst interventions since World War II.
they are building lines around russia and to some bit china, why? - control. obama has spent more on nuclear weapons than any other president ,they have now develpoed a mini nuclear bomb. Clinton will escalate that.
both of them have no business near it.
continuation-exactly bud
republican control (-Trump)would be worse
Are ISIS not going around beheading children? What is the evidence of Assad committing atrocities. Genuine question by the way. I know he was accused of using chemical weapons. Was it proven?
You do realise that article is full of quotes from Boris Johnson
And i asked has it been proven. That article is mostly speculation and only goes as far as to say its alleged Assad used them. As well as Isis et al. Forgive me for being a tad dubious but this is the same media who were convinced Saddam had an arsenal of WMDâs.
IThe infamous attorney Gloria Allred, who calls herself âa proud supporter of Hillary Clintonâ, and who is already representing the existing 10 women who accuse Trump of âunwanted sexual advancesâ has come up with her trump card. A porn star, Jessica Drake, has come forward and claimed Trump kissed her without her permission 10 years ago, and that a man who was either Donald or representing Donald called her later and offered her $10,000 to go to a party with him.
This one is hard to get your head around. A porn star, who was employed to have sex with strangers, is now mortally offended 10 years after the event that a rich guy offered her money to go to a party.
You simply couldnât make it up. This one almost sounds like a Trump plant.
Itso funny how yanks when the even get a whiff of a few bob will come out.
I see in a totally unrelated case today, some nut job is suing KFC as the family bucket of chicken didnât look like it does in the ad.18 million sheâs looking for
Is an unwanted kiss always classified sexual assault? When did that happen and is there a guide to what is and isnât acceptable. Is it just a kiss on the lips or does it have to involve some tongue. is a kiss on the cheek ok? What about kissing someoneâs hand. Jesus James Bond must be in some bother.
If thatâs what you truly think, then you are either a wum or an idiot.
As you canât seem to grasp what is going on here, Iâll vote for the latter.
You mentioned she was a porn star and then said âyou couldnât make it upâ in reference to her allegation.
What relevance does her being a porn star have to the allegation? Thereâs a clear implication there that because sheâs a porn star, she shouldnât have the same rights in relation to not being sexually assaulted as everybody else. Itâs the same type of âshe was asking for itâ excuse you might expect to see in a Daily Mail comment section.
