from the judgement: "'However, that is not because she was not involved in disclosing information from the Private Instagram Account: I have found that she was.
'Rather, her indignation at the accusation flows, in my judgment, from a combination of factors. Ms Vardy’s part in disclosing information to The Sun was, it seems to me, unthinking rather than part of a considered and concerted business practice.
'Consequently, there has been a degree of self-deception on her part regarding the extent to which she was involved, as well as a degree of justified resentment at the exaggerated way in which her role has at times been presented during the litigation. '"
What did Coleen Rooney get out of it besides the judge agreeing she was in the right? Presumably she still has all her legal bills to foot which could run into millions? Does Vardy have to pay her anything as well?
Vardy foots 70% of Rooney’s costs and 100% of her own according to a “learned” source I was listening to. How this is arrived at is clearly some Dickensian statute in their legal system. Anyway, according to Tristan it leaves Rooney to cough £300k and Vardy on the hook for somewhere between £1.7 - £2m.
Is it possible the two of them are in on this together just sell a few books afterwards or something? The whole thing seems a bit mad and incredibly boring as well.