You should go back to defending baby serial killers.
I don’t defend serial killers of babies. Unlike you, I’m actually interested the truth. People like you would have had the Guildford Four hanged.
I’ve had a look through your Twitter a couple of times. It’s grimly hilarious. You’d swear you were some KKK head from Alabama rather than somebody from Limerick.
Your posts on climate and every other topic here are of that vein.
Trees and land absorbed almost no CO2 last year. Is nature’s carbon sink failing?
The sudden collapse of carbon sinks was not factored into climate models – and could rapidly accelerate global heating
You’ve literally (and not figuratively) spent the last couple of days defending one. It’s deeply disturbing.
To the far left, anyone with dissenting voice is a “KKK head”. I’ll take that as a compliment from you.
Sorry to break this to you mate but a wide range of very credible people in journalism, politics, science and medicine and are asking serious questions as to the safety of the Lucy Letby convictions.
To you, all them are DEFENDING A CHILD BABY KILLER.
To anybody normal in the real world, your sort of language is the language of a person with the reading age of a three year old.
And the wide spectrum of evidence from numerous topics on this forum and elsewhere online would suggest that’s the case.
This is the sort of thing you retweet. Stuff from fascist propaganda accounts painting all Palestinians as sub human scum who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered. Most of the far right head the balls here at least pretend not to be in favour of Israel’s genocide. Not you!
I wasn’t sure whether to be flattered or scared when I randomly stumbled across the fact that @Gary_Birtles_Lovechi had verbatim stolen this post and put it up as “his own” on Twitter.
A yes, you’re of the “a retweet is an endorsement of genocide” brigade. That’s intelligent thinking. 
Why would you retweet something that portrays Palestinians as sub humans who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered?
If you didn’t agree with it, like?
The RadioGenoa Twitter account IS the equivalent of the KKK in its ideology.
Look, I know you have comprehension problems because you genuinely think questioning the safety of a conviction equals support for killing babies, but still, this is really obvious stuff.
Twitter isn’t the place for you mate, you seem obsessed with mine too which is a bit disturbing.
Mate I haven’t cogged any of your posts and passed them off as my own. I came across it randomly, it popped up on my feed the morning after Ireland lost to New Zealand in the Rugby World Cup last year.
Of course I was intrigued by that, as anybody would tend to be when if you saw somebody stealing stuff you’ve written and passing it off as their own.
You’re very precious. You should copyright it next time if you’re that put out by it.
You should look back over the last few posts to see who’s being precious, petal.
Not really into copyrighting random posts on here. But as I said I didn’t know whether to be flattered or scared when I saw you’d stolen the post and passed it off as your own.
So, do you agree with the RadioGenoa tweet that you re-posted? The one framing all Palestinians as sub human scum who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered?
Why would you re-tweet it if you didn’t?
It says that nowhere on the tweet as you well know. It asks a very pertinent question as to why Egypt (amongst other Arab neighbours) refuses to take Palestinian refugees. Why is that?
It doesn’t say it specifically because Nazi Twitter accounts generally try to maintain faintly plausible deniability. I mean Hitler never said specifically he was going to exterminate six million plus Jews, and he didn’t personally do the actual killing. In the world of the far right “faintly plausible denier”, that either means Hitler didn’t do it or that it didn’t happen, before the mask slips and they give the game away that they worship this grotesque act.
There is an obvious implication to the tweet - that all Palestinians are sub human scum who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered.
Twitter is useful for one thing at least - by quickly scanning the tweets that come from a particular account it allows you to almost immediately build up a highly accurate general picture of that account’s worldview.
A quick 30 scan of @RadioGenoa tweets will show the reader exactly what the account is about - promoting a Nazi, KKK, whatever you’re having yourself fanatical far right worldview, a nihilistic, genocidal worldview.
A quick scan of your account (beyond the tweet you cogged off me) would suggest something fairly similar.
Obsession……not just the name of a perfume.
3 Likes
That isn’t much of a response. You’re badly rattled that I’m telling the plain truth that you genuinely have a lot of utterly abhorrent views that you can’t seriously defend.
Because you can’t defend these abhorrent views, you resort to standard trolling and stonewalling like this.
That’s the INTERNET for ya. That’s what far right people do. They flood the zone with bullshit.
I’m a conservative. All our views are “abhorrent” to you.
conservative = bigot
A terrible bigot so I am.
No, being a conservative does not automatically make someone a bigot. Conservatism is a political philosophy focused on maintaining traditional values, limited government, and often fiscal responsibility. People can hold conservative views on a range of issues—such as economic policies, governance, or social matters—without harboring prejudice or intolerance toward others.
A bigot, on the other hand, is someone who is intolerant of others based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal attributes. While certain individuals within any political group, including conservatism, may hold bigoted views, it’s not accurate or fair to label all conservatives as bigots.
People can hold different political beliefs without necessarily being intolerant or prejudiced. It’s important to assess individuals based on their specific attitudes and behavior rather than make broad assumptions about entire groups.
2 Likes