Why would you retweet something that portrays Palestinians as sub humans who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered?
If you didn’t agree with it, like?
The RadioGenoa Twitter account IS the equivalent of the KKK in its ideology.
Look, I know you have comprehension problems because you genuinely think questioning the safety of a conviction equals support for killing babies, but still, this is really obvious stuff.
Twitter isn’t the place for you mate, you seem obsessed with mine too which is a bit disturbing.
Mate I haven’t cogged any of your posts and passed them off as my own. I came across it randomly, it popped up on my feed the morning after Ireland lost to New Zealand in the Rugby World Cup last year.
Of course I was intrigued by that, as anybody would tend to be when if you saw somebody stealing stuff you’ve written and passing it off as their own.
You’re very precious. You should copyright it next time if you’re that put out by it.
You should look back over the last few posts to see who’s being precious, petal.
Not really into copyrighting random posts on here. But as I said I didn’t know whether to be flattered or scared when I saw you’d stolen the post and passed it off as your own.
So, do you agree with the RadioGenoa tweet that you re-posted? The one framing all Palestinians as sub human scum who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered?
Why would you re-tweet it if you didn’t?
It says that nowhere on the tweet as you well know. It asks a very pertinent question as to why Egypt (amongst other Arab neighbours) refuses to take Palestinian refugees. Why is that?
It doesn’t say it specifically because Nazi Twitter accounts generally try to maintain faintly plausible deniability. I mean Hitler never said specifically he was going to exterminate six million plus Jews, and he didn’t personally do the actual killing. In the world of the far right “faintly plausible denier”, that either means Hitler didn’t do it or that it didn’t happen, before the mask slips and they give the game away that they worship this grotesque act.
There is an obvious implication to the tweet - that all Palestinians are sub human scum who deserve to be penned into a ghetto and slaughtered.
Twitter is useful for one thing at least - by quickly scanning the tweets that come from a particular account it allows you to almost immediately build up a highly accurate general picture of that account’s worldview.
A quick 30 scan of @RadioGenoa tweets will show the reader exactly what the account is about - promoting a Nazi, KKK, whatever you’re having yourself fanatical far right worldview, a nihilistic, genocidal worldview.
A quick scan of your account (beyond the tweet you cogged off me) would suggest something fairly similar.
Obsession……not just the name of a perfume.
That isn’t much of a response. You’re badly rattled that I’m telling the plain truth that you genuinely have a lot of utterly abhorrent views that you can’t seriously defend.
Because you can’t defend these abhorrent views, you resort to standard trolling and stonewalling like this.
That’s the INTERNET for ya. That’s what far right people do. They flood the zone with bullshit.
I’m a conservative. All our views are “abhorrent” to you.
conservative = bigot
A terrible bigot so I am.
No, being a conservative does not automatically make someone a bigot. Conservatism is a political philosophy focused on maintaining traditional values, limited government, and often fiscal responsibility. People can hold conservative views on a range of issues—such as economic policies, governance, or social matters—without harboring prejudice or intolerance toward others.
A bigot, on the other hand, is someone who is intolerant of others based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or other personal attributes. While certain individuals within any political group, including conservatism, may hold bigoted views, it’s not accurate or fair to label all conservatives as bigots.
People can hold different political beliefs without necessarily being intolerant or prejudiced. It’s important to assess individuals based on their specific attitudes and behavior rather than make broad assumptions about entire groups.
If you sympathise with trump and his ilk you aren’t a conservative. You are a fucking idiot.
Pretty much all far right people claim to be either “conservative” or “centrist”. It’s a transparent lie because these people cannot defend their views in a serious way. So they lie and cloak themselves in more socially acceptable labels, and then drown out all challenge with bullshit and trolling and shouting nonsense. This is why we have the mass bullshit industry. It’s set up by extremely rich people to protect the mostly extremely rich people in the public eye who hold these nihilistic views from any challenge, and to manufacture consent for insanity by brainwashing. You are a classic example of the brainwashed foot soldier, brainwashed by extremely rich people and the flooding of the zone with bullshit.
You aren’t remotely “conservative”. I’m not a conservative in a general sense but I do recognise there is such a thing as a conservative who isn’t a fascist. People like Michael Heseltine or John Major were conservatives who weren’t fascists. They were amenable to challenge and debate. They were reasonable people even if you didn’t agree with them. They were a world away from your views.
The one issue which should be the great conservative one of our time is the climate crisis. What could be more “conservative” than wanting to avoid the destruction of the ability of humans to live in much of the world?
What could be more conservative than wanting to avoid mass famine, mass migration on a scale we can scarcely imagine, mass fire, mass flooding, mass extinction?
You, the self proclaimed “conservative”, are cheerleading all these things. Still, at least you’ll be able to laugh at the victims on the INTERNET, that’ll be so funny, unless you should become one yourself, which would be even funnier.
It wouldn’t actually but the INTERNET can make you a bit cynical so you fire in these throwaway comments you don’t actually mean.
None of the Trumpbots here are able to say what’s “conservative” about him, or them.
Like “centrism”, “conservatism” is a term that is roundly abused by so many of those who describe themselves as such.
That’s a fascinating twitter account.
Lets be honest, we’ve all wanted to cancel Thurles.