I can agree with that argument in the private sector and have seen it myself. But itâs academia we are talking about, they do fuck all anyway.
The misogynists will be up in about an hour for another whinge.
How can offering the posts to females only be called equality of opportunity?
I agree that more needs to be done if they are satisfied that women are not getting a fair crack of the whip in terms of promotion, opportunity, etc but I disagree with this method.
Itâs the 21st century. You donât hire the person best suited to the job. You hire someone who tilts the gender imbalance. Or the non gender
Being a woman is the new being a black
Is there any evidence whatsover that a 50/50 gender balance (or indeed any balance at all) is beneficial? There is hardly a job on earth, nor pastime/hobby, nor TV programme, nor product that would appeal to men and women exactly equally.
No idea mate.
They should really pay these fortunate women who end up in these roles 500 or 600 times the market rate as itâd help address the gender pay gap within academia.
I always think of that joke when coming in to land at Shannon or Dublin and the pilot coming on announcing to set you watch back to 1965
Yes actually. The research is mainly on boards of companies or organisations or other such committees. It shows that committees are increasingly more effective the more diverse they are in terms of background and experience.
Itâs an interesting one because it means that at top senior management level, if all the other senior managers are of a type, the best person for the job is anything but that type.
cooks, cleaners, fair enoughâŚ
Takes me back to the days in UL, when the cleaning ladies used to knock on the door of the jacks and walk in even if you were having a piss. Theyâd be cleaning up and thereâd be a lad in a cubicle grunting shitting his lungs out for all to hearâŚ
They still do that!
So not rugby supporting middle class males or females then.
Indeed.
That doesnât mean it would have to be 50/50.
were you the lad cleaning the jacks?
You asked if any balance at all if beneficial. I answered to say it was.
he asked if 50/50 gender balance was beneficial, you said as much diversity as possible. Totally different things.
It doesnât have to be a woman/man to have diversity.
He said âor indeed any balance at allâ.
which I ignored because it is illogical. balance generally means 50/50