The āmost moral army in the worldā are up to their old tricks again I see.
Israelis 1 - hamas 0 :guns:
There will be outrage in the Guardian tomorrow.
Rather inconsistent of you I would have thought that you get all moral about a throwaway comment by an Israeli on this forum yet find their indiscriminate carpet bombing by the Israeli army such a great laugh. But perhaps you buy into their propaganda that theyāre the most moral army in the world and see some of that in yourself.
get back under the bed willya :guns:
If youāre going to try some right-wing trolling youād be better off not using the surname of such a noted socialist.
This chap is giving live updates from Gaza. Seems like a full-scale ground invasion is about to start.
There are homes to be built.
Cutting off Hamas military head before the attack on Iran might be a good tactical move too.
Then again, there is an election looming on the horizon.
Looks like itās almost shit or bust time.
[quote=āSidney, post: 473347ā]
Rather inconsistent of you I would have thought that you get all moral about a throwaway comment by an Israeli on this forum yet find their indiscriminate carpet bombing by the Israeli army such a great laugh. But perhaps you buy into their propaganda that theyāre the most moral army in the world and see some of that in yourself.[/quote]
What are they supposed to do when rockets are being lobbed over the wall? Mickee is from Cark, Sid. I have no illusions about my weaknesses, unlike ye lefties.
Horrible Israeli cunts,child killing scum and anyone who defends that is a piece of zionist shit.
A while back I deliberately ran over my neighbouring familyās dog. They were upset at this and their kids started playing football outside my house where I had specifically told them not to. Then they broke one of my windows with the ball. So I thought, fairās fair, I drove my car through their the fence, took over their sitting room, kitchen and bathroom of their house, walled those rooms off from the rest of the house, took control of access to the front and back doors, locked the family into the two bedrooms, made them live four to a room (thereās eight in the family) and only let in food through the letterbox, which I usually throw in the bin because itās not very nice. Sometimes I decide to give them have a small bit of it if Iām in a good mood. Iām a really great guy. Give me a prize or Iāll get my big brother after you. Heās a heavyweight boxer you know.
Oh, did I forgot to say that their grandfather originally owned my house, but my grandfather stole it from him in the 1940s? My grandfather was a really great guy too.
What does mickee have to do with this? Heās a horrible cunt.
:lol: 
Three people have been killed as rockets fired from Gaza struck southern Israel.
I hope thereās a big war. A proper one. With ground troops and tanks etc, not just a shitty one where they fire rockets at each other from 500 miles away.
[font=Verdana][size=3]We are constantly told by the supporters of Israel that there is a difference between the deliberate targeting of children and the deaths of children merely as a result of that wonderfully Orwellian phrase, ācollateral damageā. To those people, Iād like to ask: does that also apply to IRA bombings, such as the one in Warrington, or to the āReal IRAā bombing of Omagh, amongst others? Because there is usually a very strong crossover between people who are vehemently anti-IRA and vehemently pro-Israel. [/size][/font]
[font=Verdana][size=3]Were the deaths of children (and adults in the latter case) at Warrington and Omagh merely collateral damage? It wasnāt the aim of either set of bombers to kill children, uncomfortable as that truth may be for some people. Does that mean that those bombings were not murder? If the answer is no, as Iām sure youāll agree it is, does that not mean that when Israel kills civilians with aerial attacks, that the answer is also no - ie that it very much [/size][/font]is[font=Verdana][size=3] murder?[/size][/font]
[font=Verdana][size=3]It isnāt difficult to work out the answer.[/size][/font]
If Liam Neeson didnāt save so many of these cunts we would not have these problems today.
[quote=āSidney, post: 473358ā][font=Verdana][size=3]We are constantly told by the supporters of Israel that there is a difference between the deliberate targeting of children and the deaths of children merely as a result of that wonderfully Orwellian phrase, ācollateral damageā. To those people, Iād like to ask: does that also apply to IRA bombings, such as the one in Warrington, or to the āReal IRAā bombing of Omagh, amongst others? Because there is usually a very strong crossover between people who are vehemently anti-IRA and vehemently pro-Israel. [/size][/font]
[font=Verdana][size=3]Were the deaths of children (and adults in the latter case) at Warrington and Omagh merely collateral damage? It wasnāt the aim of either set of bombers to kill children, uncomfortable as that truth may be for some people. Does that mean that those bombings were not murder? If the answer is no, as Iām sure youāll agree it is, does that not mean that when Israel kills civilians with aerial attacks, that the answer is also no - ie that it very much [/size][/font]is[font=Verdana][size=3] murder?[/size][/font]
[font=Verdana][size=3]It isnāt difficult to work out the answer.[/size][/font][/quote]
Do you know for a fact that the Warrington or Omagh bombers did not mean to kill children? Really, like?
Yes.
RUC and MI5 could easily have prevented Omagh from happening.
Warnings were provided for the Warrington bombs.
So itās the RUC and MI5ās fault then basically?
Yes. MI5 knew the bombing was going to take place but did nothing to prevent it, instead they meddled to make sure it was a tragedy. The ādissidentsā have been so heavily infiltrated since their inception that it would be impossible for MI5 not to know this was taking place. Those who made and planted the bomb were only the small players in Omagh. Why would they look to kill innocent civilians in a heavily populated nationalist town, a town in which was one of the more anti-GFA in the O6?