Maybe i am a bit simple but generally when people go planting bombs or firing rockets they intend to kill people. And i donât think they are too bothered who gets in the way. On either side of a conflict.
Thatâs what I would have thought too balbec.
I pray for the day that child friendly bombs and rockets become the norm for peoples involved in conflicts worldwide.
A large proportion of IRA bombs have been designed to inflict economic damage on Britain, with a few notable exceptions. There were no human targets at Omagh or Warrington.
The so called âdissidentsâ are all touts MI5 know whats going on before they do
+1.
These organisations are riddled with informants and double agents, the armed republican movement has been pretty much dead since Adams decided to move towards a settlement in the late 80âs. While there is a massive sense of disillusionment within the nationalist community the outcomes of the GFA agreement, these groups are never likely to manifest themselves into anything other than a occasional nuisance for the Brits.
Those pesky humans and their habit of going about their business eh.
How dare they.
MI5 are keepin themselves in work up there rather than be shipped off to afganastan
Totti is bang on here
MI5 are the most guilty in terms of Omagh- the Real IRA didnt set out to kill anyone that day- MI5 did & you could argue their strategy paid dividends as support for the dissidents never took off after that
strange that Piles, Gola ,KIBMan and carryharry wax lyrical about James Bond and the British secret service when the reality is that omagh and the dublin monaghan bombings were their dirty work
Correct there tase
Find me one Republican who celebrates the death of Jonathan Ball and Tim Parry or celebrates the Omagh bomb.
On the other hand, somebody like Baruch Goldstein who shot 29 civilians to death is lauded by many Israelis as a hero.
http://en.wikipediaâŚiarchs_massacre
The aim of the Warrington and Omagh bombs was, as Totti has said to inflict economic damage, the same as the Bishopsgate, Baltic Exchange, Manchester and Canary Wharf bombs.
Now you can say that the bombers mightnât have been overly bothered if civilians got in the way, and to be honest, Iâd probably agree. That doesnât mean the aim was to kill civilians.
Can you answer me if you think Warrington and Omagh constitute murder?
Can you answer me the same question about Israelâs aerial bombing of Gaza? Does it constitute murder or not?
Can you answer me if you think Israel has any intention of coming to a peaceful solution, and if so, what evidence is there for this?
Do you not acknowledge that the fundamental injustice at the heart of this conflict is pretty much entirely perpetrated by the Israelis?
cat got your tongue balbec?
The Israelis always get âtoughâ in the run up to elections. Dead Palestinians = votes.
examples?
Bit like the way george w used to use the âterrorâ alert
you said in the tv thread last week that you normally have little or no time for top gear but you couldnt wait for the new episode as it was going through bond cars
Not me pal, and tying your bullshit into a tv program about the cars driven by a fictional character is a new level of ridiculousness on your part.
Youâre no fun any more. The move to the colonies has ground you down.
[font=arial][size=1]
[size=2]
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/18/us-palestinians-israel-gaza-house-idUSBRE8AH0AP20121118[/size]
[size=2]
[/size]
[size=2]
GAZA | Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:35am EST[/size]
[/size][/font]
[size=5]
[font=arial]size=1 - Ten Palestinian civilians were killed on Sunday in an Israeli air strike on a house in Gaza, Palestinian medics said, the highest civilian death toll in a single incident during five days of fighting.[/size][/font][/size]
Balbec is probably out celebrating this.
We know mickee will be