Well, Russia. Israel is in breach of more security council resolutions than any other state, so youâre not far off anyway.
Sidâs criticism of international law is specious. X happened in breach of international law and no one was held accountable therefore all international law is pointless. Itâs a silly and shallow hot take.
The âwar on terrorâ was as clear a breach of international law as youâll ever see, but, semantics.
IMontefiore always produces tremendous content
.
would also recommend this book:: Amazon.co.uk
The most fascinating city in the world perhaps
it isnât pointless, itâs vital, but itâs use as a political tool kind of makes it redundant, law should apply to every one equally, whatâs happening in the middle East is callous. Uphold it or it becomes pointless
Iâm not criticising international law. Iâm saying that when the people who claim to be the guarantors of international law have no intention of holding those who flagrantly break it accountable because theyâre âour ally who we will never, ever abandon, no matter whatâ, you have a problem.
The double standard becomes too obvious and you become morally discredited. This then breeds ultra-cynicism within populations and people turn to conspiracism and extremism.
Yeah Iâd agree with that. But that horse has long bolted.
Hereâs one for you: Robert maxwellâs last phone call was to Anthony blinkenâs father in law
âŚwhat does this have to do with anything?
Itâs reported elsewhere that the murderer was shouting âAllahu Akbarâ
âŚand again, what does this have to do with Israel/Palestine?
Tell me about it. Twitter has a lot to answer for.
Potential for religiously-motivated acts of violence/terrorism across the western world would presumably be the theory. Itâs not that complex
Stop assuming a bunch of shit that nobody knows is true mate; there is enough of that bullshit online.
Itâs laborious having to explain these concepts in explicit detail to you.
Hamas called for a âday of rageâ across the world today so the presumption is that this could have been the rationale for the attack 
Sense of entitlementâŚ