Iād take the 5-1
I think youād be mad. I think itāll be a lot closer. The mobilisation of the no side is impressive .
Iād say theyāll shoot themselves in the foot repeatedly as it gets closer and debate intensifies, in my personal experience Iām hearing that middle ground voters (particularly in my workplace) have been turned off them by the posters and gobshites like yer man in Limerick
The mart wouldnt be a repeal stronghold
Is it? Genuine question btw.
Lot of people wont vote in that situation.
Yupā¦ Stories like your one from the communion mass are wide spreadā¦ Priest in Cork pulled someone up out of the crowd to speak against repeal after he had read the Bishops letterā¦ 4/5 young people got up and walked out and you can be sure more felt like doing itā¦ You can multiply that across the country. As Iāve already said, the posters are causing major outrage.
They should face criminal charges.
pro abortionists resorting to Russian style spambot influencing, as they become increasingly desperate āeveryone I talk to is voting yesā āI heard a priest in Roscommon handed out leaflets with pictures of dead babies at confessionā its fascinating to watch
I am for giving children the opportunity to grow up and sample life rather than hand reckless people a delete button for the consequences of their actions.
If youāre not ready to have kids, then youāre not ready to have sex. People need to face up to the consequences, itās not about them anymore, itās about the children.
What about the children that were on the same boat as Mountbatten? Did the IRA have the right to press the delete button on their lives?
They sampled life
A man served a custodial sentence for that. He was punished by criminal law. The IRA apologised for the loss of the childās life. You want to make those who choose to deprive a child the right to live free reign to do so.
You havenāt answered my question. No whataboutery please.
They are completely different situations. The law punished the accidental killing of a young boy. Those advocating the killing of babies during pregnancy want to absolve the killers of punishment and make it legal.
Ironic for a lad who is for absolution of baby killers to be moralistic on war killings. Of course it was wrong but it was not intentional and it was deeply regretted.
You are engaging in whataboutery and asking me not to do the same. Seems like you donāt like having to deal with your own gospel, typical atheist.
Again, I note your refusal to answer the question.
You are a hypocrite and you support the murder of children.
I only go to pedigree sales on saturday. A gentleman farmer
Refusal to answer the question? Itās there in black and white. I said it was wrong, your hypocrisy is so evident though.
All for killing unwanted babies, but moralistic of the consequences of war. All for whataboutery when the parameters fit but deeply rooted against it when they donāt.
The fact your morals are based on nefarious double standards says it all.
Pot and kettle.
Iām the one without the double standards. Youāre the one vagrant lying displaying them.