Youâve previously exposed @flattythehurdler as a bullshitter and ran him off the forum for several weeks. Clearly you must be a right wing dickhead.
I have neither called Rittenhouse a hero or said the other two deserved to die, so try and debate with what people have said rather than what you wish they have said.
The criminal history of the lads who were shot is relevant as it speaks to the kind of individuals they were. A violent criminal is more likely to commit violence than a homeless volunteer. For some reason those on the left and in particular champagne socialists like @flattythehurdler @Rocko and @Bandage always find themselves on the side of violent criminals.
Also try and learn the facts of the case, they are easily available. He didnât cross state lines with a rifle, he procured the rifle from a friend in Kenosha. I agree wholeheartedly he had no business being on the street with a rifle, nor did anyone who was armed that night. He wasnât charged with having a rifle, he was charged with intentional homicide. The evidence supported his plea that he acted in self defense. Everyone rational who is familiar with the evidence accepts this, even CNN who helped create the narrative that he was a racist who went to Kenosha to shoot black people.
1 Like
Kind of ironic you telling me to debate what was said considering I didnât
A) say that you called Rittenhouse a hero. I did say people keep referring to the deceased as a hero, which no one has done so other than you.
B) other people have very clearly outlined they are happy the deceased was killed
The history of the deceased has nothing at all to do with it. He wasnât killed because he was a racist. You have mentioned this at least ten times now as some sort of justification for his death.
Iâll correct my point about having the rifle when he crossed state lines, which makes absolutely no difference whatsoever. He left to go cause hassle. If he had decent intention he wouldnât have been parading around with a gun like that. Again, to say a guy walking around with a gun like that is self defense and not provocative is just semantics that they can hide behind. Itâs bollix what happened that you can just go out with guns and kill someone. And same would have been had he been killed. People saying its not understanding America and its culture, but maybe most right thinking people would think that culture is just wrong
6 Likes
Thatâs it in a nutshell. Anyone who thinks that was a good situation or a good outcome has a screw loose or has been completely indoctrinated. Where most of the rest of the western world gasps at the absurdity of the violence, you have buffoons on here trying to defend it because it suits a political opinion that theyâre too blind to question. So they start screaming âsocialismâ at anyone who might venture the thought an assault rifle wasnât maybe to de-escalate the situation.
6 Likes
You clearly havenât followed the case nor the media reporting of the case. The narrative that was created by most of the media was that the three individuals shot by Rittenhouse were the good guys, chasing down a dangerous armed individual. Calling them heroes was obviously satire on my part, you should be used to satire on this site.
There are no good guys in this story, and yes I fully agree laws that allow people walk around in public with guns are wrong. But the case was based on whether he was justified in shooting people because they presented an imminent threat to his life. The stateâs role was to prove that he did not act in self defense, they failed to convince the jury. Mainly because their own evidence showed he acted in self defense. Itâs as simple as that.
Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon on CNN agreed it was the just outcome. I suppose they must be indoctrinated right wing fascists.
You were a cheerleader for the âpeacefulâ protests last year which resulted in the deaths of at least 20 people and hundreds injured, so save us your moral outrage. You are perfectly fine with violence as long as it is done by the side you support. A bit like politicians who call for getting rid of the police and then call 911 when the mob turns up at their own door.
7 cum swallowers liking that cum swallowing post 
Youâre obsessed with CNN. Quick helper for you - nobody gives a shit what CNN said or didnât say.
Iâm a cheerleader for nothing - and certainly not for the state of race relations in the US or the gun laws that facilitate violence. Nobody in their right mind could be happy about what happened in the US or that Rittenhouse got away with his violent actions. But then I guess not everyone is of their right mind so weâll get some regurgitated diatribe response that isnât anything to do with anything anyone has said but will reference socialism, CNN and morality. Save yourself the trouble, Take your opinion as read (and scorned).
2 Likes
But that is clearly incorrect as the opinions voiced on these pages by several posters (not you) are clearly based on reporting from US media, and CNN is the most common outlet people in Ireland watch, or their coverage is carried by Irish outlets.
Where do you think posters got their opinions that Rittenhouse had no business being in Kenosha (he worked there), that he crossed state lines with a weapon (he didnât), that he was a white supremacist racist (no evidence whatsoever of this)? This is the narrative that most US media ran with.
I will continue to post my opinions on here, even though it clearly annoys you as you are intolerant of anything but woke opinion, and label anyone who disagrees with you as a racist. If you donât want opinions that offend you, then ban me.
1 Like
Given how Rittenhouse and George Zimmerman got away scot free itâs genuinely surprising that this cunt actually got convicted.
Because when you boil it down thereâs fuck all difference in what he did compared to Rittenhouse and Zimmerman. He just used a different weapon, a car driven at high speed.
US law now requires that you prove that such a murderer did not feel their life was under threat. How can you prove that? Itâs an impossible bar and legitimises delusion, fantasy and paranoid bloodlust.
Would Fields get convicted now? Probably not, youâd have to say.
TFK at itâs very finest.
1 Like
An SUV has ploughed through a Christmas parade in a place called Waukesha, Wisconsin, which is Milwaukee basically.
Certainly looks like a heinous crime and a terrorist attack to me but unfortunately Wisconsin law classes it as self defence if the driver thought the apparently elderly people he (Iâm presuming here, sorry if anybody is offended) mowed down were a threat to his life.
I donât think Wisconsin has one of these Republican laws which makes it legal to run over protestors but itâs easy to see where he may have got the idea.
Careful, certain opinions allowed only.
@Gman if youâve evidence he went there with intent to shoot people where did you get it? Some fools opinion on twitter? It doesnât exist.
Iâve asked it twice but the morons have scurried, no harm send them scurrying again. When a gun was pointed at him, what should Rittenhouse have done?
Rittenhouse was a fantasist, a cosplayer going around a town as if he was Rambo. Instead of that he should have just gone online where heâd find lots of cosplayers, for example ones who once thought they were IRA freedom fighters, snigger, and now cosplay as climate activists, not out of any real concern, just to look superior and get some online adoration. I could even recommend a website where heâd find such types.
What should the victims have done? You appear to be saying they should have shot Rittenhouse dead given we know he was a live and present threat to life.
You said he was a hero.
You donât get it mate. Kyle Rittenhouse was a lifeguard so a danger to society.
His victim, the child rapist, is the good guy.
Leftist logic, you see.
This is appalling. God help those poor people.
And yet it is legal.
Murica.
âLifeguards should be allowed to murder with impunity. Theyâre lifeguards! Nobody who is a lifeguard could be a bad person?! Harold Shipman was a doctor! How could he have been a bad person?!â
Maybe the driver of SUV in the above terrorist incident was a lifeguard?
As always with left morons, they canât debate what happened so shriek about other things. Failing that, the real cowards just shut down debates they canât handle. Watch this space.
âYou canât debate! Also I refuse to debate you because I canât stop making a racist fool of myself!â
I just made a few burritos there for lunch. I would like to apologize to the forum for my white supremacy and racism.