American Mass Shootings / Stabbings / Car Crashes/bridge collapses

[myboyblue]

@StoneCold

10 years now

Nowhere to run?

[Raylan]

@maroonandwhite

What about the Karen’s on this forum gleeful that the shooter mentioned Elon Musk.

TNH?

[Cheasty]

@Juhniallio

Id ban guns mate. And id have a fuckoff gun amnesty with a buy back scheme. Yep. Buy the guns back off them. Even if you only got half of them, youd stop a whole lot of killing.

So simple and obvious it might just work.

[Alphakrul1]

Probably not the ones handing them back that would be at risk of killing a dozen or two innocents as a way of spitting the dummy.

[maroonandwhite]

@Juhniallio

Id ban guns mate. And id have a fuckoff gun amnesty with a buy back scheme. Yep. Buy the guns back off them. Even if you only got half of them, youd stop a whole lot of killing.

Thanks for proving the simpleton point anyway. You’d ban them and expect people to just hand them in. And you think if you got half of the 400 million plus in circulation (in reality you’d get less than 10% I’d guess) problem solved.

[maroonandwhite]

@Raylan

TNH?

Have you the virtue signallers on mute?

[Raylan]

Maybe it was in one of your side groups - throw up the post(s) by all means

[maroonandwhite]

Sid about 32 posts up and glas chiming in after. You mustn’t be much of a guard if you can’t find that.

[Julio_Geordio]

@Tassotti

Its perfectly reasonable to own an assault rifle, the King of England could invade at any time and you need to be prepared

How are you supposed to hunt deer without a machine gun?

[StoneCold]

@maroonandwhite

And you think if you got half of the 400 million plus in circulation (in reality you’d get less than 10% I’d guess) problem solved

It would still mean less gun deaths

[maroonandwhite]

I’m not sure it would. There would be 100s of millions of guns out there and obtainable if someone wanted to use them. Whats being suggested is prohibition, or a war on drugs. Except the item in these cases don’t have an expiry date and are equally untraceable, and have a use that runs deeper for most owners, they make them feel safe.

The only possible gun control measure, and an effective one, would be a ban on the sale of and use of semi automatic rifles. Very little damage could be done with single shot ones in comparison.

[Raylan]

American Mass Shootings / Stabbings / Car Crashes

The full free-thinker bingo card.

Ah, now I see what set you off

[maroonandwhite]

Took you a while.

Not surprising really.

[Juhniallio]

@maroonandwhite

@Juhniallio

Id ban guns mate. And id have a fuckoff gun amnesty with a buy back scheme. Yep. Buy the guns back off them. Even if you only got half of them, youd stop a whole lot of killing.

Thanks for proving the simpleton point anyway. You’d ban them and expect people to just hand them in. And you think if you got half of the 400 million plus in circulation (in reality you’d get less than 10% I’d guess) problem solved.

Yes mate. When you ban things it takes them out of circulation. If only some other country had tried it and the effects had been widely researched… oh wait

Australia's gun laws stopped mass shootings and reduced homicides, study finds

[Cheasty]

Don’t the gun nut lobby always say gun owners are law abiding citizens? So guns were banned, the gun owners would obey the law, right? Because they’re law abiding citizens?

[artfoley]

@Juhniallio

Yes mate. When you ban things it takes them out of circulation.

yes prohibition was a resounding success in america, as was the war in drugs

[maroonandwhite]

Australia got 650000 guns back.

America has 400 million and in that tens of millions of them unrecorded and untraceable.

And the gun culture and trust of government, and level of danger in parts of American society is completely different but you haven’t the required intelligence to appreciate that.

[Julio_Geordio]

@artfoley

the war in drugs

Sounds deadly in many ways

[maroonandwhite]

@artfoley

yes prohibition was a resounding success in america, as was the war in drugs

You’re dealing with a proven simpleton

[Cheasty]

It’s a sure sign some somebody is super intelligent and totally confident in their debating ability when their first tactic is always to shout personal abuse at anybody who disagrees with them.