Because you deem them to be stronger teams and wish for them to play weaker teams.
And you consider teams being being kept apart favouritism. So obviously keeping them apart would be an advantage( in your eyes).
If it would be an advantage then the Provincial system would be a disadvantage, either way they cancel each other out.
Whatâs your issue with that?
They would have to dump provincials for that i feel.
Unless it decided which comp you were in it may become a waste of time.
CL works because there is home and away. This wouldnât work.
It is poor logic. For example raping someone and then not raping someone else would not cancel each other out.
Poor analogy.
It was worthy of your logic on this thread.
âBecause I want it to be that wayâ is not a good argument.
You havenât been able to articulate a good reason for that system not to work.
Why should an unfair draw or a draw perceived to be unfair be given the chance of being repeated in the qualifiers? Whatâs your problem with it? Where is the advantage?
Hereâs the reason again, copy and pasted. Read it. get back to me if you donât comprehend it.
But Ulster teams are of middle ranking. Why would they be afforded an advantage as a group? Maybe if one team performs to a certain level continuously they should gain an advantage of seeding, a la coefficients(the period could be determined by the GAA but Iâd imagine theyâd follow the old bakerâs rule and plump for a 12 year period-everyone knows that makes sense). That is a position I can understand.
But you seem to wish to gain advantage for your provincial teams because of some imagined group strength. Imagine a situation where Ireland got a better seeding in playoffs because our group had Germany in it for the euro qualifiers and was therefore âharderâ. Itâs bizarre.
Youâre being evasive and belligerent.
Is it an advantage or not? Simple question that requires a simple answer?
The collective hammering bomber has taken is simply amazing.
You have to admire the endurance.
Sadly Ulster teams donât have the same endurance in the qualifiers due to injuries, suspensions, fatigue and fighting a war.
1 Like
You forgot the southern media bias as well. 
The Holocaust?
Ulster has a right to self-defence. Ulster has a right to exist.
There are those who donât know when theyâre beaten and there are those who never look like they will be beaten. Iâm the latter.
Traits you certainly recognise. You certainly believe it to be an advantage, as you believe it fixes the current âdisadvantageâ your Ulster teams suffer. I think youâre argument is deeply flawed in that you champion Ulsterâs supposed lack of favouritism in itâs own championship but decry it in the qualifiers. You seek advantage for a random group of middle achieving counties for no reason other than they are roughly as good as their neighbours but consistently below the best. Not shit, not great, give us some freebies you free state cunts. The Ulster way!
By the way, I do think itâs ridiculous that Donegal had to play a qualifier against Tyrone this year. I think it fucked up their chances a bit. It would make sense for the Ulster champions to be seeded the following year in my view.
I asked you a simple question which you continue to evade.
Is it an advantage or not?
The Ulster Championship is the only functioning Provincial Championship - itâs not it that needs change.
Fixed
Iâve answered your question 3 or 4 times pal. Itâs not my fault you donât understand more complex responses than yes or no.
All 4 provincial championships function perfectly well, they select a champion and provide teams for the qualifiers in various rounds. Youâve confused the word functioning with competititive. Theyâre not even similar.
No, youâve evaded giving a straight answer, youâve been deliberately evasive from the outset because you know if say itâs an advantage then youâre openly admitting Ulster teams are being disadvantaged in the current system and if you say itâs not an advantage then you have no justifiable reason to reject.
So what is it? An advantage or not?