Ashes

Tomorrow marks the 1 year anniversary of the conclusion of the greatest sporting feast the world has ever witnessed. Fook how time flies by. Great interview with Michael Vaughan in the Times today, says he might be back for the last 2 tests after Christmas. He’s flying out to Australia with the team and hopes to prove his fitness with some club games in Perth.

England and Wales name their squad for the tour on Tuesday, hoping to see Ed Joyce get in but he might not make it. Played for England in the last 2 ODIs against Pakistan over the weekend and though they won both to share the series, he only made 13 and 8. They’ll probably bring 7 batsman, 1 to cover the front line 6 and Freddie will come back to be one of them. That leaves the 6 that ended the test series this summer; Trescothick, Strauss, Cook, Pietersen, Bell and Collingwood.

Really weird with Trescothick pulling out of the one day squad for the Champions Trophy that precedes the Ashes. It’s due to the ‘stress related’ illness that forced him to come home from the winter tour last year. It’s all a bit vague and odd.

Ed didn’t get in, really disappointed for him. He’s in the reserve squad though, who will be based over in Australia during the tour. Freddie returns as captain - this is going to be immense.

Good to see Freddie getting captaincy for the tour- deserves it more… and personally, he’ll do a much better job then Strauss and Tresco…me thinks!

Go home preshy, this is an adult website.

Shouldnt you be in school?

It is getting closer now. Aussie’s seem to be in decent shape whereas there’s more uncertainty over England and Wales at the moment. The Champions Trophy in India over the next month will be crucial for their injured players in proving their fitness. You have to laugh at Glenn McGrath, this is from the BBC:

Bold McGrath repeats 5-0 forecast

Australian bowler Glenn McGrath has predicted his team will win the Ashes 5-0, just as he did in 2005 when the tourists lost 2-1 in England.

“I reckon it will be 5-0 this time, as well,” he said in the Mail on Sunday.

“To say anything else would be negative. If we’re going to win 2-1, or 3-2, which games are we going to lose?”

McGrath, 36, will play for New South Wales against England in a tour game before the first Ashes Test to ensure he is 100% match fit for Brisbane.

He took the first six months of the year off to to be at home with his wife Jane when she was diagnosed with cancer for a third time.

But the man who has 136 Ashes wickets in his locker is playing cricket again and is hungry to help Australia win back the Ashes.

McGrath believes Duncan Fletcher’s side are there for the taking after suffering injuries to Michael Vaughan and Simon Jones.

He said: "England are not as strong as they were last year. But Australia are a lot stronger. And I’m fit, unlike last time.

"Put it this way, in the three Tests I played in last time, we drew two and won one.

"England are not the same team as they were. I’m disappointed in them.

By the time I play for New South Wales against England I’ll be up to 90%

“I expected them to kick on after beating us and conquer the world but it just goes to show how losing players through injury can unsettle the side.”

England’s first three-day game of their Australia tour takes place in Sydney from 12 November.

It is due to finish nine days before the first Test of five starts at the Gabba and McGrath wants to play in it.

He said: "I came back to play for Australia in the one-day games the other week in Kuala Lumpur and was a bit rusty.

"Last week I played for my local grade cricket club, Sutherland, got through 26 overs and took 4-50.

"Now that’s a big workload by anyone’s standards but there was no physical reaction afterwards at all.

"I’m going to the ICC Champions Trophy at 75-80% and believe that by the time I play for New South Wales against England in the tour game before the first Test I’ll be up to 90%.

“That should give me the perfect opportunity to fine-tune and be completely ready for the start of the Ashes.”

I love that stuff from McGrath, particularly his justification of the 5-0 prediction: “If we’re going to win 2-1, or 3-2, which games are we going to lose?”

How does the betting look for the series - I presume Australia are reasonably strong favourites?

about a month and a half to go until it starts up again. if you look at how either team has played since last year you’d have to say that the aussies are in far better shape. they pumped the windies (granted they are rubbish) and SA in home and away series. england on the other hand have also played at home in beating sri lanka and a good tight series v pak, but their away form wasn’t impressive albeit tough to win on the sub-continent. considering the aussies don’t have many (if any??) injuries worries, their preparation will be much better than the poms who have injury worries all over the place , and to crucial performers to boot. aussies to win them back for me by the fourth test

Hook shot is Pietersen’s achilles heel

Kevin Pietersen’s attacking nature could prove to be his undoing in Australia.
Mike Selvey
October 26, 2006 01:09 AM

In Steve Waugh’s autobiography Out of My Comfort Zone, there is a photo taken in 1988 in Brisbane of the author, on the back foot, hooking a fast bowler. Waugh uses it to illustrate that, back in the mists of time, it was a shot that he used to employ with some success. He has since banished it from his repertoire because it didn’t suit the percentages. Runs accrued against the risk entailed did not stack up: eliminate the shot and it was one fewer way to get out and, once bowlers realised that bouncing him was an exercise in futility, made life less threatening physically.

He averaged a small matter of 51.06 with 32 centuries. Waugh was an outstanding example of a successful pragmatist.

On a slow pitch in Jaipur last Saturday Kevin Pietersen was on the receiving end of a bouncer from Australia’s Mitchell Johnson, which appeared to unsettle him to the extent that he got out next ball. Shortly after the captain, Andrew Flintoff, got the short-ball treatment from Shane Watson and, pulling feebly, holed out to midwicket. Both bowlers were operating to an obvious plan, succeeded in their intent and offered a foretaste of what can be expected.

The issue for both players will be how they react to the anticipated Test match barrage, in which bowlers are less restricted by legislation than they are in one-day matches. I think I know what the initial response would be from both, should they need it, drawing on the example of Michael Vaughan, who used the pull shot as a staple as he plundered his way to three centuries in the series when England were last in Australia. Vaughan saw the percentages in a different light from Waugh, reasoning that the risk, in his case brought such rewards that it justified itself. In other words, one would expect Pietersen and Flintoff to carry on regardless. Of the two it is Pietersen, the better exponent of the shot, for whom I would express more concern. At The Oval last year following a restrained start, Vaughan counselled Pietersen to express himself, to have fun. In an hour Pietersen had taken the match and the Ashes away from Australia, taking on the short bowling of Brett Lee and succeeding.

There is a large element of adventure attached to his batting that, as he becomes more familiar to the opposition, bowlers are beginning to exploit: impatience outside off stump and scant recognition of the dangers inherent in taking on the short ball without regard to circumstance.

In the second Test against Pakistan in Faisalabad last winter he completed a fine century by hooking Shoaib Akhtar for six. Next ball he tried to repeat the shot but spliced a catch to mid-on instead. Shoaib unveiled his “chicken man” celebration for the first time. “I’d hit the previous one for six, so why not that?” was Pietersen’s response. The answer was, he had been suckered by tremendous bowling; the second bouncer was different, faster, on him before he could execute the stroke. It is what Andy Roberts used to do to hapless batsmen who thought they had the measure of him.

Pietersen is at the stage of his career where perhaps he feels it is incumbent on him to be a crowd pleaser when selective or even total discretion might better serve his and the team cause. There has been no more destructive batsman in history than Viv Richards but he never confused aggression with recklessness.

Denis Compton, I was frequently reminded by the Middlesex scorer Harry Sharp, did not sweep every ball he faced as popular perception had it and was as capable as the next man of a slow hundred. Pietersen has it in him to be a great player in a great series. But he might look at the career of Steve Waugh and wonder if there might be a better way.

It’ll make for cracking cricket if the Aussies are going in with a gameplan of bouncing KP and Freddie. Neither of those 2 boys will back down despite the points the guy makes about Waugh. Though he makes sense you have to remember Waugh was a pragmatic batsman, a dogged, determined player who could easily curb attacking instincts like playing the hook shot. The other 2 are among the most attacking batsman in the world - to expect them not to hook would be folly, it would involve a root and branch change in philosophy and style. It’s not going to happen. Prepare for the fireworks. I cannot fooking wait.

Making the pitch

He battled his way out of a dead-end town, but alcohol and gambling almost destroyed him. Now Ricky Ponting is the world’s best batsman. His next challenge: to regain the Ashes

Malcolm Knox
Sunday October 29, 2006
Observer Sport Monthly

The Bourbon & Beefsteak Bar, in Sydney’s red light district, never closed. For a start, it had no doors. Opened in 1968 to attract American GIs on leave from Vietnam, it was the city’s nocturnal destination of last resort, as popular with pimps and crooks as with tourists and office workers out on the town. One Sunday night in January 1999, Ricky Ponting dropped in at the Bourbon after another poor performance against England in a one-day international. He was 24 and in his third year in - and often out - of the Australia team (he had been dropped and reinstated four times). His confidence was fragile after a wretched season. He was gambling more than he should and drinking too much. There was a feeling that he had risen too fast and that the team management could not keep protecting him from his worst excesses.
That Sunday night Ponting had been drinking with team-mates when he met a young, dark-haired woman. She was not Kellie Sainty, his long-term girlfriend from Tasmania. Together they went to the Bourbon where, later, Ponting tried to hit the dance floor with Carlotta, a famous drag queen. The details of what happened next may have remained hazy were it not for the presence of an off-duty photographer from Sydney’s Sun-Herald newspaper, Julian Andrews, whose photographs of Ponting stumbling out of the Bourbon with one-and-a-half black eyes were published later that week. It emerged that Ponting had been punched by a bouncer following an altercation. Carlotta said the cricketer had taken exception to a barman refusing him a drink. As he left the bar, supported by his ‘mystery date’, Ponting looked every bit our Tasmanian George Best. The most talented young batsman in Australia seemed set on self-destruction.

With the efficiency of a bank securing its investment, the Australian Cricket Board hauled Ponting in, showered him down and paraded him as a repentant AA convert. At a press conference in the Grand Chancellor Hotel in Hobart four days later, Ponting, his eyes still bruised, conceded that he had an alcohol problem and would seek counselling. He uttered all the required bromides, apologised to his state and country, and then went to cricket practice. It was a sad and unconvincing performance from a troubled young man. We had seen this kind of flawed character before, it was said. Nothing could save him. You could take the boy out of working-class, asbestos-clad Tassie, but you couldn’t take Tassie out of the boy.

I met Ricky Ponting in 1996 when I became cricket correspondent for the Sydney Morning Herald. Our relationship, at best, can be termed ‘professional’. I didn’t like Ponting and he didn’t like journalists. During the next three years, I can’t recall exchanging a single word with him outside formal interviews and press conferences.

My first impression of him was a reminder that many great batsmen, from Bradman to Lara, are small men. Ponting seemed shorter than the 5ft 10in the stat sheets gave him and he couldn’t have weighed more than 11 stone. He was still a boy.

Every team has its careerists and its wild boys, and Ponting, whose love of the racetrack and greyhounds earned him his nickname ‘Punter’, gravitated to the latter. He was soon a member of the Australia team’s ‘in’ group. Led by Shane Warne and Mark Waugh, this clique shared a set of attributes - risk-taking, flamboyance, cockiness that verged on arrogance - that was buoyed up by their remarkable sporting talent. Talent was their insurance against the consequences of misbehaviour. As Warne has shown repeatedly, self-belief on the field can blur into a kind of sociopathy off it.

When I met Ponting, he was still a fresh arrival in the team. A teenage prodigy from Tasmania, he had scored 96 on his Test debut against Sri Lanka in 1995 before being given out leg before by the Pakistani umpire Khizar Hayat, who had his own colourful history (he had been the second umpire, with Shakoor Rana, in Mike Gatting’s notorious Faisalabad flare-up in 1987).

In his second summer, the boy was given a man’s job: the number-three position vacated by the retiring David Boon, the pioneer Tasmanian player and Ponting’s spiritual guide. It was a sign of respect for his talent that he should be expected to fill such an important position against West Indies’ ageing but still potent Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh. He failed. Within two Tests he was dropped, the wonder boy sent back to finishing school.

It was the first real setback Ponting had experienced. As an 11-year-old he had scored centuries against men at the Mowbray club in Launceston, a town in northern Tasmania. A working-class suburb of mainly public housing, Mowbray was rough-edged even by Tasmanian standards and had the archetypal blue-collar cricket club. Mark Ray was an imported first-class player from Sydney in the 1980s who represented the Riverside club, in Hobart. He describes himself as ‘the perfect target for Mowbray to hate and destroy’, and the rivalry within Tasmania, particularly Launceston, was as fierce as any he experienced during a decade of top-level cricket. ‘Mowbray were rough and tough, aggressive, and liked a scrap,’ he says. ‘But there was a substance behind it. They played good cricket and I liked to have a beer with them after the game. Once I suggested going into the Mowbray dressing room and the Riverside boys said, “You’ve got to be kidding!” So I went on my own. By the time I left Tasmania, we had a booze-up and I think 10 Mowbray blokes turned up and only one or two from my own club.’

Ponting’s parents - Graeme, an outstanding golfer, and Lorraine - enjoyed the club atmosphere of sport, a drink at the end of the day and a touch of class warfare. The cricket was tough. Troy Cooley, a Mowbray player and England’s bowling coach from 2003 until his return to Australia this year, remembers Ponting ‘hanging around outside the changing rooms’ as a young teenager. ‘We were the working-class club and Launceston was the private-school club,’ he says. ‘The rivalry was pretty hard.’

Nine years older than Ponting, 6ft 3in and then one of the fastest bowlers in Australia, Cooley says he can’t remember the kid ever backing away from him in the nets. ‘He was scared of nothing. He came to the club as a dasher, a risk-taker, and the batsman you see now was the batsman he was then. He was fearless, never scared to play his shots, never took a backward step. And he was extremely ambitious. He was one of those kids who lived for sport and was good at anything he tried: football, golf. We’re lucky he chose cricket because he would have succeeded to the same level in anything else.’

As a stylist, Ponting is an aggressor who loves to confront bowlers; superbly balanced, he has a strong array of shots to every part of the ground. His greatest strength is also his only weakness: he can be too aggressive.

Graeme and Lorraine Ponting gave Ricky nothing but encouragement. Graeme has told the story of how he promised Ricky a new bat if he scored 20 runs in a game as a tiny boy against older players. ‘He was only little and couldn’t hit the ball very far but he kept playing these straight drives and good proper shots that got him to 20. So I had to go out and buy him a new bat.’

As a student at Brooks Senior High School, Ponting was, like most sportsmen, in no way academic. The usual career path was from school to the dole queue. The fast track out of Mowbray was sport. Brooks Senior High fed the local cricket and Australian rules football clubs, and in the Ponting home sport gave Ricky a sense of purpose and structure. His talent was noted early. Tasmanian cricket commentator Neville Oliver told a reporter from Hobart’s Examiner newspaper: ‘We’ve got a 14-year-old who’s better than Boon - but don’t write anything about him yet, it’s too much pressure.’ At 16, Ponting was plucked out of Mowbray and taken to Adelaide to be nurtured by Rod Marsh at the Australian Cricket Academy. By the age of 17, he was representing Tasmania in the Sheffield Shield. It was 1992. Full professionalism was new in Australia. Ponting was among the first crop of teenagers who could aim at doing little else in life but play cricket.

The gilt of prodigy shone from Ponting, but the shadow of Mowbray followed him. After being dropped in his second year of Test cricket, Ponting returned with a triumphant century at Headingley in 1997. But he faltered again in Australia the next summer. His father was causing embarrassment, too. The then chairman of the Australian Cricket Board, the late Denis Rogers, was concerned about the number of times Graeme Ponting would get merry at cricket functions and rave noisily about how great Ricky was. Then, touring India in early 1998, Mark Taylor’s team lost their first series since 1994. For the clique to which Ponting belonged, the subcontinent was an unhappy place to tour. As one Australia player complained: ‘There are no TABs [Australia’s betting agency for horse racing] in the whole country.’ Nor were there the other standard perks of the job: eager groupies, in-house adult movies, good golf courses. The players were suffering acutely from what journalist Mike Coward called ‘the curse of insidious and self-defeating Indophobia’. Australia lost the first Test in Chennai and then, in the second, in Calcutta, suffered their biggest defeat since 1938. Ponting struggled in both Tests, scoring a total of 89 runs in four innings.

He liked the game to be played at pace, and India required patience. Frustrations piled up. The night the Calcutta Test finished, some of the players gathered in the bar of the Taj Bengal hotel and watched satellite coverage of the final of a pre-season Aussie rules competition, between St Kilda Saints, for whom Warne had played as a junior, and the North Melbourne Kangaroos, who were Ponting’s passion. Warne and Ponting both once had dreams of playing Aussie Rules, and, in some ways, each has brought the physicality of that contact sport to cricket. The bar - and particularly the two players - grew noisy as the game progressed. Ponting’s team won. Most of the team went to bed. Amid a dismal tour, Ponting decided to let off some steam and went to a local nightclub, the Equinox.

En route to Bangalore for the third Test, we heard that an Indian newspaper was carrying stories about Ponting’s bad behaviour in the nightclub. The team management met Ponting that same morning. The manager, Steve Bernard, told journalists that Ricky couldn’t remember doing anything wrong, but they fined him all the same.

Sohini Sarkar, a woman who had been at the Equinox, spoke to me about how Ponting had been behaving in the bar. ‘With one woman,’ she said, ‘he rubbed himself against her. With another, he was pulling his zipper up and down, drawing attention to his zipper. One of the management asked him to leave and Ponting assaulted him.’

I wrote the story for the Sydney Morning Herald. As former Australia wicketkeeper Ian Healy once said, journalists were expected to be ‘part of the effort’. If you weren’t with ‘the boys’, you were against them. In giving the victim of Ponting’s behaviour a voice in the Australian media, my transgression was a major one. I was ostracised by the entire squad. But then an interesting thing happened. Two weeks later, after top-scoring in a one-day game against Zimbabwe, Ponting gave a press conference. It was the first time I’d been anywhere near him since becoming his tour-wrecker. We began tensely. If this was Mark Waugh, he would have refused to answer my questions. Shane Warne would have blathered emptily, without seeking to hide his contempt. Steve Waugh would have snapped sarcastic monosyllables. But Ricky Ponting, who was 23 years old and had just been embarrassed in the papers, looked me in the eye and answered each question expansively. He shook my hand and showed no sign of malice. It was, in that context, a more impressive performance than the century he had scored. It was at that point that I saw why people considered him a future captain.

His turmoil wasn’t over: the Bourbon & Beefsteak Bar, gambling problems and more form slumps lay ahead. Even today, the old Ponting isn’t completely dead. He rose during the 2005 Ashes with his on-field outburst at coach Duncan Fletcher, during the fourth Test at Trent Bridge, over England’s use of substitute fielders. He rose again in the first games of the 2006 season, in Malaysia, which everyone treated as meaningless one-day jamborees - everyone except Ponting, that is, who was twice in trouble for questioning umpires’ decisions.

Ponting is under constant pressure approaching a season in which Australia will strive to regain the Ashes that his own team lost. Former Test batsman Greg Ritchie recently said Australia couldn’t win the Ashes under Ponting, because his captaincy had been so poor ‘you wouldn’t expect it from … [an] under-14’. Ian Chappell, the 1970s captain who never lost a series, would rather that Shane Warne had the job. Chappell has said that while, in 2005, Michael Vaughan made ‘his players believe it was all under control … with Ricky you’d see a meeting of three or four guys and it would go on for three or four minutes. I don’t think he’s an indecisive person, but with guys like Warne, [Adam] Gilchrist and [Glenn] McGrath around him, great players, he didn’t feel comfortable telling them, “Piss off, I’m running this show”.’

Mowbray is not another country for Ponting; it is not even the past. He will never bury or escape the memory of the toughness of those early years and probably, like Allan Border, will get crankier with each new grey hair. Yet something did change in Ponting after the nightclub affrays. Perhaps he finally realised that he had too much to lose, too much talent to waste. ‘He was just growing up,’ Troy Cooley says now. ‘You knew he was going to fulfil his talent as long as the wheels didn’t fall off, and he just did a few things that would be typical of any young guy in his situation.’

Perhaps it was as simple as romance. Ponting used to be teased that his old Tasmanian girlfriend still clung to him even when he was an international star; but instead of following Warne down the path of excess, he found Rianna Cantor, a woman he adores. He extols his ‘beautiful wife’ and blows kisses from the field to her, rather than to the dressing room. When she met Ponting, in 2001, Cantor had no idea who he was - which, he has said, was the best thing for him. She was a law student at the University of Wollongong, graduating after they married in 2002. In his book Ashes Diary 2005, he wrote of her: ‘You are my inspiration, my love, and I am so proud to have you in my life. No matter what happens on the field, as long as I have you beside me then I know everything in the world is right.’

In his books, he thanks her family, middle-class and aspirational, rather than his own back in Tasmania. There is a sense, here, of a man who prefers where he is now to where he came from.

Rather than fulfil the template of uneducated working-class youth rising too fast and being destroyed by fame, he has more than fulfilled his promise and is acclaimed by many as the world’s best batsman - he averages 58 in 105 Tests, a record that places him in the all-time elite.

Since losing to England last summer, Australia have played 12 Tests, winning 11 and drawing one. In spite of the grumbling of Ian Chappell and others, Ponting has become an increasingly poised and respected leader, ‘a solid citizen’ as Cooley calls him. Ricky and Rianna have bought a big house on the southern Sydney waterfront, where their neighbours include the Waugh brothers and swimmer Ian Thorpe. They are settled and happy. In public, Ponting seems more at ease and serene than he has for many years, even if, on the field, the old rough edges are sometimes still exposed, which is as it should be for an Australia cricket captain. No one would like to think that he has gone soft. His mission now could not be clearer: to lead his hugely motivated team to victory over England and thus reclaim the Ashes.

Have just been annoying The Bhoy here by telling him I’m heading to a day of the Ashes; will be in Oz over Christmas & New Year so figured it would be worth making a day trip from Sydney to the MCG for Day 3 of the Boxing Day Test. Will be in Perth for most of that Test too, so looking forward to seeing how the atmosphere compares to last year’s Lions tour. Will revert with report.

Tell the bhoy that if he has time enough for idle chit-chat then he has time to come on here and post his views.

[b]Who should bat at No5 in the Ashes for England?/[b]

Rob SmythNovember 7, 2006 11:55 PM

They both have ginger hair and a freckled complexion that belongs to the boy next door; they both bowl wobbly medium pace; they are both so accomplished in the field that, at times, they have been ridiculed as England’s first specialist fielder. Ian Bell and Paul Collingwood certainly have a lot in common - but when it comes to their day job, with a bat in their hand, they could hardly be more different.

Bell is an idealist, Collingwood a pragmatist. Bell does most of his work on the off side, Collingwood the leg side. Bell represents style, Collingwood substance. Bell is erratic, Collingwood consistent. Even their take on gingerness is different. Bell usually masks his with scattergun blond highlights; Collingwood just leaves his as it is. It feels apt: Collingwood is a humble short-back-and-sides of a cricketer, whereas Bell is more calculated bed-head than ingenuous redhead.

Not that their differences are a problem in themselves. After all, variety is the spice of a middle order. The trouble is that, with Andrew Flintoff returning, England only have room for one of them in their team for the first Test - and their selection for this weekend’s three-day match against New South Wales will almost certainly be the same as when it all kicks off in Brisbane on November 23.

Last summer’s Ashes was defined by exquisitely close calls on the pitch. For England, the build-up to the rematch has been defined by painfully close calls off it: Flintoff or Strauss? Bell or Collingwood? Jones or Read? And, in Duncan Fletcher’s mind at least, Giles or Panesar?

In many ways, the decision reflects the choice between Kevin Pietersen and Graham Thorpe before last year’s Ashes, and not only because it is for the same No5 spot. Collingwood has replaced Thorpe as the archetypal 50 for three man. Bell, like Pietersen then, is an unknown quantity, chiefly because of his miserable series against Australia last time. But Bell, like Pietersen then, is the braver choice. In 2005 England won the Ashes by taking the risky option at virtually every turn. They continued that trend two months ago by picking Flintoff as captain. But it is easy to have good intentions 10 weeks before the day dawns. Now, on the eve of the first Test, this will provide a more instructive window into just how courageous England are feeling.

In their different ways, both men are not to messed with: Collingwood is a streetfighter, Bell a deceptively pitiless high-flyer. He was chillingly certain in his punishment of Pakistan in the summer, but Australia is a different story. In recent times, there are very few players who have recovered from a poor first series against them, so self-perpetuating is the mental hold exerted by Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne. The West Indies’ Daren Ganga is just about the only exception on a list that includes the likes of Boeta Dippenaar, Basit Ali, Mathew Sinclair and, most famously, Daryll Cullinan, like Bell a natural stylist who plundered mediocre bowling for fun but who often struggled against the big boys. With these Aussies, a rabbit is for life, not just for Christmas.

That Bell has a lot more natural talent than Collingwood is not in doubt. The man oozes effortless class. He made three beautiful centuries against Pakistan, but they were against a weakened attack and, invariably, in a very favourable match situation. And while his assertive 43 against Australia in the Champions Trophy was a crucial innings psychologically, there were two major things missing from that game: the intensity and attacking fields of Test cricket, and Shane Warne. Bell is a good player of spin, but Warne had his number last year. Bell seemed numbed by Warne’s aura and transfixed by his slider. And at No5, he will invariably be facing Warne straight away. There remain legitimate concerns as to whether Bell can handle it mentally. A phrase lurks that dare not speak its name: flat-track bully.

The same cannot be said of Collingwood, a born scrapper who actually relishes being on the precipice. His reputation as a subcontinental specialist owes as much to his mental strength as his technique (the rigid bottom-handedness of which could invite trouble on trampolining Australian pitches). He is a limited player, which is both a strength and a weakness. Collingwood is acutely aware of those limits, and plays admirably within them, but he will never reach the heights of Bell. You pretty much know what you are going to get - as a consequence, he is ostensibly a more natural conduit between the big hitters at No4 and 6 - but that is not always a good thing. Thus far Bell has been all or nothing, a spreadbetter’s nightmare, Collingwood a constant. In their Test careers, Bell has been dismissed in single figures in 44% of his innings. For Collingwood, the figure is an industry-standard 25%. Their averages in series in which they have played two or more Tests also reflect that perception:

Bell: 227.00 (without being dismissed), 17.10, 52.16, 21.83, 93.75
Collingwood: 22.25, 47.25, 68.00, 27.20, 54.00

But Collingwood’s consistency comes with a problem: his inability to nail really big, match-winning scores like Bell can. He rarely surrenders initiatives, but then he rarely seizes them. Very occasionally he goes into one-day mode and goes big, but generally he tends to deal in nothing scores - exactly half of his Test innings have been between 10 and 39, a collection which betrays an essentially negative mindset, that of the side’s Jim’ll Fix It. Bell has grander ambitions. When England make their decision this weekend, we will know just how ambitious they are.

Haven’t had time to delve into these articles in depth but Bell before Collingwood imo.

I see Australia have McGrath coming back into form but can a 36 year old perform for 5 intense 5 day Test matches in the space of 6 weeks? Equally they’re an aging team right through - Langer, Hayden, Warne and Gilchrist are all 35 or 36. Even Ponting is 32. I never realised Martyn was such a veteran either.

England and Wales have youth on their side but will they have the mental fortitude without the best captain in world sport? Simon Jones is also a massive loss.

We saw in that meaningless game of kick and hit the other day how fooking incredibly competitive Australian sportsmen are. They will do everything in their power and more to wrestle back the Ashes. If E&W do retain them with their depleted squad then it will rank as one of the greatest sporting feats of our generation.

I was interested to see Fletcher’s comments last night about the make up of the E&W side. He said if Freddie was fully fit on his ankle they would go in with 4 bowlers and play the extra batsman. This struck me as a very negative tactic, ala playing with one up front in football and trying to hold out for a draw. All the problems they caused the Aussies last year were down to the 4 pronged pace attack and then a bit of spin from Gilo. The fact that Freddie’s fitness is a doubt means they need to have the assurance of the extra bowler in case he breaks down in a game (a sub can’t bowl in cricket). This is why it is a case of Bell or Colly now rather than playing them both. As things stand my team would be:

Trescothick
Strauss
Cook
Pietersen
Bell
Flintoff
Read (wkt)
Hoggard
Mahmood
Harmison
Panesar

And it’s all kicking off in 2 weeks time bhoys and ghirls. What a treat we’re all in for.

Just read those two articles, excellent reads both of them.

The Ponting article in particular is very good.

What does this shambles mean for England’s Test team?

England’s one-day drubbing to a Prime Minister’s XI has further muddied the selection waters ahead of the Ashes.
Rob SmythNovember 10, 2006 10:58 AM

The last time England won an Ashes series in Australia they famously went into the first Test as a team that apparently had only three problems: can’t bat, can’t bowl, can’t field. Nobody expected quite such a touching homage today. England were absolutely battered by the Prime Minister’s XI: a margin of 166 runs would be emphatic in a Test match; in a one-dayer it is an absolute drubbing. It was a performance of jetlag on the pitch, and jet-black humour off it for England fans used to seeing their side humiliated Down Under. It was not supposed to be like this anymore.

Defeat in itself is not a problem - England lost their opening game of that 1986-87 tour, and also on their last visit in 2002-03 - but the manner of it has further muddied the already cloudy selection waters ahead of the first Test in 13 days’ time.

Saj Mahmood, pencilled in to play at No8, was manhandled for 97 runs off nine overs. This isn’t unusual - Mahmood is often taken to the cleaners in pyjama cricket - but if he suffers that treatment at the hands of Phil Jaques, there are obvious concerns as to what Australia’s A-list batsmen might do to him on an off day. Mahmood is the designated loose cannon, a luxury permitted and indeed demanded by a five-man attack, but his erratic aim may be too much of a risk.

Then there is the wicketkeeping conundrum. Geraint Jones’ selection ahead of Chris Read suggested that he had inched back into pole position, as much because of Read’s regression during the Champions Trophy as his own acceleration, and when he took a storming catch to dismiss Tim Paine early on the decision looked justified. But then came the scenario that Jones’ critics have proffered for ages: he drops a sitter to reprieve the Aussies’ best batsman early on, and is punished by that man going on to smack a decisive century. Today it was Phil Jaques, let off on 21 before blasting a matchwinning 112. If it’s Ricky Ponting at Brisbane, it will be even more costly.

The other concerns were, in comparison, minor, but still of significance. Ashley Giles bowled more than Monty Panesar, suggesting that England are not so much thinking the unthinkable as rubber-stamping it. Marcus Trescothick failed. Kevin Pietersen looked like he’d left his brain in London. Andrew Flintoff was peripheral.

Then again it was only one-day cricket, and England always lose at that. But if they get tonked again by New South Wales in the three-day match that starts on Sunday, it really will be time to start worrying.

Its just been announced that Trescothick is out of the Ashes with this mystery stress related illness that caused him to return home from last winters tour. It really is a strange one looks like Bell will bat at 3 and Collingwood at 5 with perhaps an opportunity for Ed Joyce to be called up to the squad as a replacement.

Seriously? That’s a huge blow for England and Wales but Preshy will obviously delighted. And to think some people were suggesting he should be captain! It’s hard to think of what would force him to return home from the biggest tour of his life - if it’s the same issue surely he should have sorted it in advance.

Decent article on possible selection reprecussions here:

Where does Trescothick’s departure leave England?

Marcus Trescothick’s condition should be treated with the utmost sympathy, but his loss could yet be a blessing in disguise.
Rob Smyth
November 14, 2006 01:17 PM

Never again. That was the rhetoric after England’s shambolic Ashes tour of 2002-03, but history is repeating itself to an alarming degree. First they took punts on a series of recuperating bowlers and now their left-handed rock, having apparently made a full recovery from a summer breakdown, has pulled out of the tour in dramatic fashion.

For Graham Thorpe in 2002, read Marcus Trescothick in 2006. But there should be one difference in the two cases: Thorpe was savaged for “letting his country down”, the usual unfeeling bullshit of those whose lives have never deviated from a state of equilibrium. Trescothick should be cut as much slack as possible - we do not know the exact nature of his illness, but its severity is transparent, and in the context of that sport is an irrelevance. A stress-related illness - or whatever the contemporary euphemism is - is not something that can be diagnosed as precisely as a physical ailment. Ultimately, nobody knows anything: it is easy to say that Trescothick should not have gone on tour, or that England should not have taken him, but how were they to know he would suffer a relapse? But if he hadn’t recovered in the first place, and England were simply hoping that he would get better, their much-maligned medical team have treated the issue very thoughtlessly.

It has been suggested that England will never be able to trust Trescothick again, and that his Test career is over, but don’t be so sure: the same was said when Mike Atherton and Thorpe pulled out of the previous two Ashes tours, yet both went on to play some of the best and most productive cricket of their distinguished Test careers.

The principal reaction remains one of sadness for an obviously decent man, but inevitably attention will quickly turn to what it means for England. It is arguably a blessing in disguise - the issue of dropping Trescothick, as undroppable a player as England have had for decades, was looming large after a couple of bad failures in the warm-up games - and now that has gone. But so has England’s best all-weather batsman who, despite a modest overall record against Australia (an average of 33.76, 10.03 below his career average, with no centuries in 15 Tests), played as big a part as anybody except Andrew Flintoff in last year’s Ashes series.

Never mind the sexy cricket of the poster boys, Simon Jones and Kevin Pietersen; the earthy, pipe-and-slippers biffing of Trescothick was of greater significance. He reversed the tone of the series on that seismic first morning at Edgbaston; his jet-propelled starts consistently gave Jones and co a total of over 400 with which to play; his pre-emptive strikes in the Trent Bridge run-chase ultimately gave England a 2-1 lead, without which Pietersen’s Oval heroics would have come in the deadest of rubbers.

In selection terms, the repercussions are straightforward: Alastair Cook and Ian Bell move up to their natural positions at Nos 2 and 3 - a switch which takes them further away from their most likely nemesis, Shane Warne - and Paul Collingwood comes in to blunt Warne at No5. There is an argument for pushing Pietersen to No3, the spot that punishers like Viv Richards and Ricky Ponting made their own, but he is such an important part of England’s batting line-up that they cannot justifiably take the considerable risk of exposing him to the new ball. Last year England had the experience of Trescothick and Michael Vaughan to fall back on. Now they have the apparently imperturbable Strauss, but Bell and Pietersen - both on 18 Tests - really are going to have to come of age.

Trescothick’s departure will also, sadly, cement Ashley Giles’s selection ahead of Monty Panesar: partly because of his fielding (Giles will be needed at gully or point if Collingwood moves into the slips to fill the considerable vacancy left by Trescothick, England’s best slipper by a mile), and also because England desperately need as many players with significant experience as they can get.

Even if Giles plays, England’s probable XI have only 352 caps between them; Australia’s top four have more than that. And even if they decide on the Botox injection of Shane Watson and Mitchell Johnson ahead of Michael Clarke and someone like Jason Gillespie, Australia’s probable team would still have 776 caps.

That imbalance was not a problem for England last summer, but then they had an element of surprise and experience of the conditions on their side. This time they have neither: unless Robert Key jumps the queue from standby to first XI, or Fletcher decides to infuriate the nation by wrecking Strictly Come Dancing, England will go into the first Test with a top five who have never before batted in a Test in Australia (and a top six, unless you count Flintoff’s presence in last year’s already forgotten Super Series). In 2002, they went into the first Test with a bottom five who had never bowled in a Test in Australia. If the recovering Flintoff suffers a recurrence of his injury during the final warm-up match, as he did last time, a miserable parallel will be complete.

Presume everyone’s heard that Ed Joyce has been called into the England squad. Something of a surprise apparently, leapfrogged a couple of more likely lads.
Fantastic for him though, isn’t it. I think it’s only a 16-man squad, so an injury to a batter over the next month may well let him in in time for me to see him in action in Melbourne.