Auld birds you would shag (Aka The Liz Hurley thread) 🐐

[myboyblue]

@Chucks_Nwoko

Please bump this thread in 15 days @myboyblue.

Apology accepted.

[croppy_boy]

Utter bullshit. You can’t appreciate the class of an older lady until at least 45, they’re not even finished bearing children at 40 for God’s sake.

We may need a poll on this.

[myboyblue]

@croppy_boy

Utter bullshit. You can’t appreciate the class of an older lady until at least 45, they’re not even finished bearing children at 40 for God’s sake.

We may need a poll on this.

7 years on and you take a hissyfit over this now?

I accept your apology also.

[ironmoth]

Urgent Poll

The age for auld birds needs to be formalised.

• Over 45
• Over 40

[myboyblue]

Interesting how as lads have gotten older, the requirement to raise the age of auld birds has grown. It may have some merit. Hard to call a bird auld at 40 when you’re that age or close enough to that age yourself I guess

[Smark]

Got to be 45 minimum. I’d say north of 47 probably myself. Otherwise just put them in the lovely ladies thread. “Auld birds” at 40 FFS. They’re just lovely, not auld.

[HBV]

they’re just pictures you fucking tools

[Rintintin]

It has always been 40. Just because ye cunts are getting old now and are as old the the birds being posted the rules don’t change.

[myboyblue]

@Rintintin

It has always been 40. Just because ye cunts are getting old now and are as old the the birds being posted the riles don’t change.

I put forward that this vote is unconstitutionary and ask that it be struck out.

[croppy_boy]

No I’ve been working off 45 all along. I think I only started posted on that thread properly this year and it was definitely pointed out that the ‘birds’ had to be over 45.

There’d be fuck all difference between a bird at 35 and 40, there’s a huge difference with 45 as a limit and it’s much more noteworthy and to be celebrated when they look shaggable at that age.

[croppy_boy]

Denied. The vote has been put to the people.

[myboyblue]

@croppy_boy

No I’ve been working off 45 all along. I think I only started posted on that thread properly this year and it was definitely pointed out that the ‘birds’ had to be over 45.

As the OP noted, the age was dropped to 40 as I pointed out already. We can’t be held responsible for your tardiness or inability to follow guidelines.

This vote is unconstitutionary unless deemed so by those that matter.

[count_of_monte_crist]

Where was this pointed out?

[myboyblue]

@count_of_monte_crist

Where was this pointed out?

[briantinnion]

It’s 40 chaps. Most of us were early to mid 20s when this all kicked off and 40 seemed old back then. It stays at 40 regardless.

[Bandage]

+1. It’s 40.

And just to ensure that this post is deemed final enough I’ll add the following:

End of.

[myboyblue]

@Bandage

+1. It’s 40.

And just to ensure that this post is deemed final enough I’ll add the following:

End of.

Can we apply a temporary ban on this thread to @croppy_boy

[briantinnion]

To get this back on track, Natalie Imbruglia - exactly 40 and stunning:

[croppy_boy]

Fair enough. It widens the scope considerably.

Is the vote being cancelled then?

[Smark]

Well over 45 is winning the poll and a poll result always carries sway around these parts.